- Quicklinks
- Resources
Multicultural Affairs & Community Engagement
MACE banner

Assessments
Cultural Assessment Survey Results
Wright State University conducted a survey in October 2010 to assess our students' and employees' perceptions of Wright State University's cultural environment, specifically focusing on diversity and inclusion. The intent of the survey was not only to better understand the overall perspective of our students and employees, but also to determine if there were any significant differences in perspectives between different demographic groups.
Employees Survey Results
704 employees responded, including:
- 41 Administrators
- 266 Faculty
- 391 Staff
- 4 who did not identify
Download complete Employee Cultural Assessment Executive Summary report (PDF)
| Question | Strongly Agree | Somewhat Agree | Neutral | Somewhat Disagree | Strongly Disagree | Agree % |
Disagree % |
||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| # | % | # | % | # | % | # | % | # | % | ||||
|
1 |
Wright State creates a campus environment that values diverse employees. |
314 |
44.8% |
238 |
34.0% |
62 |
8.8% |
55 |
7.8% |
32 |
4.6% |
78.7% |
12.4% |
|
2 |
I am personally interested in increasing my knowledge about diversity. |
263 |
38.0% |
231 |
33.3% |
137 |
19.8% |
36 |
5.2% |
26 |
3.8% |
71.3% |
8.9% |
|
3 |
In general, employees at Wright State are treated with respect. |
271 |
38.7% |
291 |
41.5% |
55 |
7.9% |
47 |
6.7% |
36 |
5.1% |
80.3% |
11.9% |
|
4 |
Wright State takes appropriate action to address incidents of discrimination that occur toward diverse students. |
165 |
30.2% |
176 |
32.2% |
149 |
27.3% |
32 |
5.9% |
24 |
4.4% |
62.5% |
10.3% |
|
5 |
Wright State takes appropriate action to address incidents of discrimination that occur toward diverse employees. |
147 |
25.7% |
173 |
30.3% |
142 |
24.9% |
60 |
10.5% |
49 |
8.6% |
56.0% |
19.1% |
|
6 |
My department demonstrates its commitment to Diversity and Inclusion. |
349 |
49.8% |
190 |
27.1% |
63 |
9.0% |
49 |
7.0% |
44 |
6.3% |
77.6% |
13.4% |
|
7 |
At Wright State, there are sufficient opportunities for me to advance. |
175 |
25.6% |
191 |
27.9% |
105 |
15.4% |
118 |
17.3% |
95 |
13.8% |
53.5% |
31.1% |
|
8 |
Overall, I am satisfied with Wright State. |
293 |
41.8% |
271 |
38.7% |
67 |
9.6% |
43 |
6.1% |
26 |
3.7% |
80.6% |
9.9% |
|
9 |
My supervisor treats me with respect. |
422 |
60.2% |
157 |
22.4% |
44 |
6.3% |
36 |
5.1% |
32 |
4.6% |
83.8% |
9.8% |
|
10 |
My supervisor is open to my ideas and suggestions. |
388 |
56.2% |
171 |
24.7% |
48 |
7.0% |
36 |
5.2% |
47 |
6.8% |
81.0% |
12.0% |
|
11 |
Some employees display biases that negatively impact me. |
82 |
12.1% |
176 |
26.0% |
122 |
18.0% |
96 |
14.2% |
201 |
29.7% |
38.1% |
43.9% |
|
12 |
I have made a conscious effort to build relationships with diverse students. |
323 |
49.5% |
241 |
36.9% |
70 |
10.7% |
15 |
2.3% |
4 |
0.6% |
86.4% |
2.9% |
|
13 |
I am skillful at effectively communicating with diverse employees. |
288 |
41.3% |
335 |
48.1% |
63 |
9.0% |
8 |
1.2% |
3 |
0.4% |
89.3% |
1.6% |
|
14 |
I have biases that could negatively impact my relationship with other employees. |
6 |
0.9% |
56 |
8.3% |
76 |
11.3% |
143 |
21.2% |
392 |
58.2% |
9.2% |
79.5% |
|
15 |
I have biases that could negatively impact my interactions with diverse students. |
5 |
0.8% |
46 |
6.9% |
74 |
11.1% |
120 |
18.1% |
419 |
63.1% |
7.7% |
81.2% |
Students Survey Results
1382 students responded, including:
- 993 Undergraduates
- 375 Graduate and doctoral students
- 14 who did not identify
Download complete Student Cultural Assessment Executive Summary report (PDF)
| Question | Strongly Agree | Somewhat Agree | Neutral | Somewhat Disagree | Strongly Disagree | Agree % |
Disagree % |
||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| # | % | # | % | # | % | # | % | # | % | ||||
|
1 |
Wright State has a welcoming environment. |
612 |
44.7% |
519 |
37.9% |
153 |
11.2% |
58 |
4.2% |
28 |
2.0% |
82.6% |
6.3% |
|
2 |
Wright State is inclusive of diverse students and viewpoints. |
662 |
48.5% |
447 |
32.7% |
156 |
11.4% |
69 |
5.1% |
31 |
2.3% |
81.2% |
7.3% |
|
3 |
Other students treat me with respect. |
621 |
45.5% |
518 |
38.0% |
147 |
10.8% |
51 |
3.7% |
27 |
2.0% |
83.5% |
5.7% |
|
4 |
My professors treat me with respect and fairness. |
760 |
55.7% |
433 |
31.7% |
82 |
6.0% |
60 |
4.4% |
30 |
2.2% |
87.4% |
6.6% |
|
5 |
My contributions in the classroom are valued. |
626 |
45.9% |
503 |
36.9% |
170 |
12.5% |
36 |
2.6% |
29 |
2.1% |
82.8% |
4.8% |
|
6 |
I receive the support I need to succeed academically. |
583 |
42.9% |
460 |
33.9% |
150 |
11.0% |
108 |
8.0% |
57 |
4.2% |
76.8% |
12.2% |
|
7 |
I have made a conscious effort to build relationships with diverse Wright State students. |
435 |
31.9% |
457 |
33.6% |
307 |
22.5% |
108 |
7.9% |
55 |
4.0% |
65.5% |
12.0% |
|
8 |
I am skillful at communicating with students from diverse cultural backgrounds. |
494 |
36.1% |
537 |
39.3% |
242 |
17.7% |
75 |
5.5% |
20 |
1.5% |
75.4% |
6.9% |
|
9 |
I socialize mostly with students from my own cultural background. |
209 |
15.6% |
411 |
30.6% |
278 |
20.7% |
248 |
18.5% |
197 |
14.7% |
46.2% |
33.1% |
|
10 |
I am personally interested in increasing my knowledge about Diversity. |
469 |
34.4% |
422 |
30.9% |
329 |
24.1% |
81 |
5.9% |
63 |
4.6% |
65.3% |
10.6% |
|
11 |
I have personally experienced discrimination or harassment at Wright State. |
114 |
9.6% |
127 |
10.7% |
135 |
11.4% |
136 |
11.4% |
677 |
56.9% |
20.3% |
68.4% |
|
12 |
I have personally observed discrimination or harassment of others at Wright State. |
144 |
11.8% |
174 |
14.2% |
149 |
12.2% |
161 |
13.2% |
594 |
48.6% |
26.0% |
61.8% |
|
13 |
I have biases that could negatively impact my relationship with other students. |
37 |
3.0% |
131 |
10.6% |
193 |
15.6% |
210 |
17.0% |
665 |
53.8% |
13.6% |
70.8% |
|
14 |
Overall, I am satisfied with Wright State experience. |
602 |
44.3% |
492 |
36.2% |
155 |
11.4% |
65 |
4.8% |
46 |
3.4% |
80.4% |
8.2% |
Diversity Data 2013
Over the past few years, several measures of campus climate have been taken. Results that inform the following discussion come from the 2011 work of the Integrity Development Corporation consultants, Wright State University (WSU) data from a 2009 survey conducted by the LEADER Consortium, a survey conducted by the Wright State University ALLIES faculty/staff group, and listening sessions conducted by the Vice President for Multicultural Affairs & Community Engagement (VP MACE). Preliminary analysis of dissertation data collected by Corinne Wright were also examined in formulating this summary.
Diversity Data Summary
Diversity Data Slides
Performance Appraisals
Performance Appraisal Process Review Summary and Recommendations