Mark Willis/New Media Workshop
HOME | ESSAYS | PROJECTS | CONTACT


Literacy without Limits

The essays gathered here were written between 1994-98 for a series of graduate seminars in rhetoric and composition. They document the evolution of my own thinking about literacy as a blind reader and writer. Mine is a multi-textured literacy that could be characterized by what anthropologist Shirley Brice Heath called ever-shifting, protean shapes and modes. It is motivated by an ongoing struggle for a literacy without limits, a literacy unbounded by social, political, and economic constraints.

Literacy without Limits: An Introduction
When I re-read the essays, their academic scaffolding falls away. What remain for me are the stories and the struggle. (2004)

Whooping Cranes, Family Values, and the First Amendment
Whenever I hear a sanctimonious debate about censorship and family values, I think of Whooping cranes. In my family, the gawky, audacious, elusive and endangered birds are synonymous with the First Amendment. My parents never read the eloquent Supreme Court opinions penned by Holmes and Brandeis, but they believed in the First Amendment freedoms, and would have welcomed the Great Dissenters to our dinner table. After I became a parent, our family values about obscenity came to be codified as the Grandma test: if you would feel weird saying it in front of Grandma at the nursing home, you shouldn't say it in public in front of strangers. (1994)

Literacy, Orality, and Cognition: An Overview
The significance of questions about cognition across the oral/literate continuum extends beyond the domains of the antiquarian, the historian of ideas, and the anthropologist. Noticeably absent from the orality/literacy literature are discussions of people with disabilities for whom written texts are a barrier. (1994)

Listening to the Literacy Events of a Blind Reader
Social anthropologist Jack Goody posed a thought experiment that was meant to illuminate the essentially visual nature of literacy. "Imagine (though it is a fanciful task) Kuhn's book as an oral discourse." Listening to such a discourse would preclude the process of recursive scrutiny of text to detect, compare, and resolve inconsistent meanings. It is a literacy skill that Goody and others regarded as the cornerstone of critical thinking. Goody's fanciful problem haunts me sometimes because it is not fanciful for me. Listening to The Structure of Scientific Revolutions is precisely how I read the book. (1994)

Somewhere Over the Multicultural Rainbow, Bluebirds Fly
A discourse community can be more than the vocabulary, rules, and rituals needed to enter it. It also can form around the passion and commitment of people who need discourse with one another because their lives depend on it. Disability, adaptability, flexibility -- these are the heart of the conversation I have joined. What it means to have a disability, for me, is what it means to be alive. (1994)

When the Blind Lead the Blind: Literacy, Authority, & Collaborative Learning
Long ago, I decided that I do not need to carry the symbolic weight of this type of metaphor. Moments of doubt not withstanding, I am sure that blind people do not need to be led to their literacy or to the authority of their knowledge. As a member of that unique knowledge community called "the blind," I know how we can guide one another and lead sighted people along the way. Collaborative learning is one of the paths. (1994)

Disability as Praxis
Paulo Freire's Pedagogy of the Oppressed provides a framework for understanding both the alienation and the humanity to be found in the existential experience of having a disability. As cultural experience, disability is ripe for Freire's process of critical investigation, and it presents possibilities for human transformation. A culture of disability lives in the human power to adapt and accommodate, to make and remake ways of living to meet diverse needs and capabilities. Adaptations and accommodations are significant cultural products; making them and negotiating them are the praxis of everyday life for people who have disabilities. (1995)

Searching for a Literacy without Limits in the Zone of Proximal Development
My fitful, uneven progress toward new ways of reading underscores this point about oral/aural literacy: it is not simply a shift in sensory perception (from vision to hearing) or information technology (from print to audio texts). Reading an audio text, no matter how carefully it is recorded, is not the same as reading a printed text. Oral/aural reading involves complex cognitive processes (Lev Vygotsky's higher mental functions). The development of these processes requires transformations, rather than simple extensions, of processes involved in speech events and recognition of visual signs. Developing the skills necessary for a different type of literacy is not innate, and it is not guaranteed by the availability of adaptive technology. An adaptive device, crucial as it may be, is only a tool in the larger social process of adaptation. (1996)

Photo of Osip Mandelstam
Osip Mandelstam
A Word is the Search for It
In the autumn of 1933 Osip Mandelstam wrote a seditious poem that sealed his fate. He composed it on the elusive plane of thought and language that psychologist Lev Vygotsky called inner speech. Mandelstam never committed the poem to paper. He recited it aloud to only a handful of friends. But it quickly burned the ears of Soviet dictator Josef Stalin. The head of Stalin's secret police knew the poem by heart and recited it with sadistic relish. Vygotsky may have heard it, too, although there is no evidence that he betrayed his friend. Using the "enforced subtlety" of subtext and secret writing, poet and psychologist shared a proscribed life of the mind in the shadow of Stalin's Great Terror. This essay is a search to recover something of that life: the knowledge that a word removed from motive is a dead thing. (1998-2001)


Last updated 030904 (MW).