Who is telling the truth in the debt ceiling debate of July 2011?
A while back I looked at the global warming debate, not out
of a desire to get involved with politics, but because global warming is a
scientific issue of the kind a physics professor is expeted
to know about.� I concluded that while
there were distortions on both sides, the situation was asymmetrical: �The �warmists�
simplify and sometimes distort, while most �deniers� state obvious untruths.� While FOX news was not the worst culprit on
the internet, they did contribute to the public misunderstanding, and on TV news, as well (for documentation click here).� In what
follows I did not �cherry pick� the FOX website for errors, but was in fact just
curious as what the conservatives thought of a news conference.�
Within hours of Obama�s news
conference on the debt ceiling, google led me
directly to foxnews.com:
Beneath the picture were the following links:
Naturally I clicked on the �7 Myths About Looming Debt-Ceiling �Disaster�, which as you can
see, was the SECOND story on the website:
The first sentence of the second paragraph, �Time after time �no default�, seems to
imply that there are many precedents for not raising the debt ceiling.� The author included underlined links in the
following sentence.� As was the case when
I checked out similar links on foxnews.com regarding the global warming debate,
these links essentially go nowhere (often to previous opinions stated by the
author). I investigated the September, 2007 date because it would be easier to
find concurrent news stories, and the truth is that congress approved raising
the debt ceiling, apparently at the last minute and with virtually no
fanfare.� ��Using Google News archives, I found: 27sept2007ABCmoney.uk.pdf�� 28sep2007EugeneRegisterGuardAP.pdf��� 28sept2007-AssocPress.pdf�� 01Oct2007CityEconomistBlog.pdf
In fairness to FOX, this was listed as �opinion�.� But it was the second item on the FoxNews.com
website, and editors are expected to screen opinions and their authors for
trustworthiness.� One could also argue
that the words are technically �not false�, since there was no real �agreement�
between the president and congress.� But
the �debunking� of myth #1 seems to imply that failure by congress to raise the
debt ceiling is a real possibility that the nation could deal with.� Hence most readers would interpret the
aforementioned passage to mean that congress failed to raise the debt ceiling
in 2007.�
I believe (as of July 15, 2011) that the debt ceiling will be
raised, as it has many times in the past.�
Therefore we will never know the consequences of not raising the debt
ceiling.� As to what congress should do, I don�t know.� Without access trustworthy information from both
sides, how could I possibly know?