The
Reformation
The Reformation was a part of the Renaissance, though its origins were in
northern Europe rather than in Italy. The Protestant revolt had its origins in humanist
ideas, expanding literacy, and political turbulence. Luther and Lutheranism initiated a great split in the
church, but the Protestant movement took many different forms. Like Catholic humanists, Protestants
had increased confidence in people’s ability to know things for themselves,
including God and the Bible.
Unlike Catholics, however, Protestants believed the official doctrines
concerning salvation, the priesthood and church government were wrong. For them, the sufficiency of Biblical
authority, along with ideas of “salvation by faith” and of a “priesthood of all
believers” denied both church authority and the power of popes and priests to
confer saving grace. The spread of
these ideas produced tremendous hopes and equally profound fears.
Origins of the Reformation
We have already encountered some of the developments that led eventually to
the Reformation. In the late Middle Ages, the prestige and authority of
the church had declined, and the papacy had become a game piece of powerful
rulers. For a time in the early 1400s there were three different popes at
the same time. In the Renaissance, the Popes were worldly, that is to say
interested in power, wealth and the good life. The ideals of humanism and the
new discoveries of the ocean navigators inspired an enthusiasm for the
cultivation of secular life in contrast to preparation for eternal life.
But humanism also inspired a new sort of Christian idealism, particularly in
northern Europe. Much of this had
to do with reading. Humanists
believed in recovering and studying old texts. Catholic humanists like the
English courtier Thomas More were interested in reading the New Testament in
the original Greek for himself. Very few could read Greek. Educated
churchmen and lawyers knew Latin, but most could not read at all. Three
things changed this equation. First, increased wealth made education and
books more widely available. Second, the invention of efficient printing
in 1450 made books and pamphlets more cheap and plentiful. Third, the
reformers provided translations of the Bible into the vernacular--the common
European languages. Reading and books were no longer the monopoly of the
priesthood. One of Luther's most
lasting achievements was his translation of the Bible into German. This
translation shaped the future development of the German language much the same
way as the King James translation of the early 1600s influenced
English. Reformation and Renaissance humanism shared this ideal
especially--that people had the capacity to read and improve themselves through
knowledge. Now this ideal could be put into practice on an unprecedented
scale.
Luther's Revolt
Martin Luther had a troubled youth, though he was not troubled by things
that typically trouble young people today. He was concerned with matters that troubled devout
Christians in his day, namely the salvation of his soul. Like St.
Francis, he vowed as young man to devote himself to God, angering his
businessman father. Luther joined the Augustinian order of friars, and
applied himself to its rigorous discipline, while continuing academic
studies. He earned his doctorate in theology in 1512.
He became a star professor at Wittenberg University, but he was still not
happy. Like any good Catholic, he understood that good works (such as charity,
prayer, fasting, pilgrimages, etc) and the sacraments administered by the
priests (especially communion) were the means to obtain the grace of God.
But that didn't help him, because he was an ordained friar and he still didn't
feel confident that he had God's grace. Furthermore, he was uncertain how
many good works would be enough.
Luther's studies of St. Paul led him to conclude that one's faith, not the
sacraments, were the key to God's grace, and that made him feel much
better. But this idea in itself did not lead to the Reformation. It
has been calculated that at least 40 other theologians had reached similar
conclusions before he did. Why, then, did Luther cause the split in
Catholicism?
One reason was Luther's opposition to Papal fundraising by means of
"indulgences," and another was the church's response to Luther's
challenge. Still another reason was Luther's supreme
self-confidence. Indulgences had been around for a long time. The
Papacy had granted indulgences for crusaders. These were reductions of
penance necessary atone for ones sins. The theory was developed in the
13th century of a "treasury of merits," a storehouse of good works by
Christ and the saints that the pope could redistribute to worthy people.
These merits could reduce the time a soul spends in purgatory before ascending
to heaven. Starting in the 14th century, the sale of indulgences became
an important source of income for the pope. In Luther's day they were
needed to pay the debts on the new St. Peter's Basilica designed by Michelangelo.
It was not theoretically possible to buy one's way into heaven, but many common
folk probably thought that is what they were doing.
In 1517, Luther denounced the practice of selling indulgences. He was
attempting to start a debate, not to split the church. The church's
response was not conciliatory, however. In 1518, Luther met with a
distinguished theologian, Cardinal Cajetan, sent by the pope. But instead
of the theological debate Luther wanted, he got a statement about church
authority and a demand for a retraction. In 1519, Luther engaged in
a debate at the University of Leipzig with another famous theologian, who
argued that Luther's position was heretical, and who later helped draft of a
papal bull (decree) in 1520 requiring Luther to recant or be excommunicated.
This is where Luther's self-assurance enters in. Luther, no doubt
helped by the enthusiastic support of many lay and clerical Germans, refused to
back down, and responded to this threat with a series of pamphlets denouncing the
government and theology of the church. In these writings he proclaimed
his famous doctrines of justification by faith, the priesthood of all
believers, and his reduction of the number of sacraments from seven to
two. These pamphlets were widely published, and made Luther either a hero
or villain everywhere in Europe.
Luther quickly became a national hero in Germany, where anticlerical
sentiments were strong. People from many walks of life could find
something in Luther to like. As you can see from our reading, Luther
denounced the special claims of church authority in both secular and spiritual
life. He argued that secular rulers alone controlled worldly
affairs. This was a welcome idea from the point of view of the rulers of
the many German states, like Saxony, whose ruler protected Luther from both the
church and the Holy Roman Emperor. Those from the middle strata could
also appreciate the message that they, rather than the powerful bishops and occasionally
corrupt priests, were responsible for their own salvation. Finally, the
peasants found new inspiration to demand new freedoms and rights.
The peasants rose in rebellion in a number of parts of Germany, and in the end
some 100,000 were killed in brutal fighting. While the fighting was going
on, however, Luther denounced the peasants as an unjustified murdering
horde. The freedom and equality Luther spoke of was spiritual, not
political
The Establishment of Protestantism
In order to win the tolerance of the Emperor, Charles V, one of Luther's
friends, Philip Melancthon, wrote a confession to be considered for approval by
the Diet (Imperial congress) meeting at Augsburg in 1530. This
"Augsburg Confession" was, however, rejected by the Emperor and war
between Catholic and Protestant Germany loomed. Luckily for the Protestants,
Emperor Charles was too preoccupied with conflicts with France and the Ottoman
Turks. But religious war finally did come in 1546. After a decade
of indecisive campaigns, a truce was called in 1555--the peace of
Augsburg--that guaranteed the right of the German princes to establish
Lutheranism in their territories. It meant that in every German state,
the subjects were expected to be either Catholic or Lutheran, depending on
which one the ruler made the official religion. Protestantism did not
lead to a system of toleration and individual choice. It did, however,
irrevocably split Christianity, and introduce a volatile division in European
culture and society that would play a role in many future conflicts.
The Anabaptists
In studying the Bible, some believers earnestly tried to base their beliefs
and practices strictly on the Gospel texts and on the practice of the original
Christian church described in Paul's letters and in Acts. Followers
of Conrad Grebel, a Swiss humanist, and Michael Sattler, a former German monk,
and others, insisted that infant baptism had no basis in scripture. They
also attempted to follow the early church in adopting a simple worship entirely
free from state control. They were called Anabaptists for their belief
that baptism should only be performed on adults who confessed and repented
their sins. Because they rejected the authority of either the church or
the state, they were feared by the authorities and often persecuted.
Sattler and most Anabaptists were usually pacifists, but some were more
assertive. Authorities could point to the events in Münster in 1534 to
confirm their fears. Radical reformers there had taken control,
suppressed Catholicism and Lutheranism, and tried to create a community of
gospel equality in preparation for the imminent second coming of Christ (see Acts)
Calvinism
A still more important branch of Protestantism was Calvinism. Calvin
was born in France, and educated at the University of Paris, where he was
exposed to both humanist scholarship and Catholic theological training as he prepared
for the priesthood. Later he switched to the study of law, but pursued
his love of classical texts, especially the Roman stoic philosophers.
Calvin was converted to Protestantism, and promoted the importance salvation by
grace. He was forced to flee Paris to Switzerland, where he befriended
many leading reformers. There, in 1536, at the ripe age of 26, he
published his masterwork on theology, The Institutes of the Christian
Religion.
Calvin was soon recruited to help liberate and reform the town of Geneva,
Switzerland, then under the rule of a worldly and unpopular bishop. In
Geneva, Calvin helped to create a sort of Protestant theocracy, meaning that
the social life of the town was governed by the Protestant church elders.
These elders examined the lives of all the citizens and punished them
accordingly. Dancing, card-playing, theaters, drunkeness and gambling
were all banned. (On the other hand, the failure to eliminate
prostitution led the elders to organize and regulate the prostitutes and give
them regular medical treatment.) The city was also very concerned to
provide for the poor as an act of charity and also to reduce crime.
Unlike Thomas More, Calvin did not think much of women's abilities, and
they were permitted no role in either church or state.
The key to Calvin's theology is his concept the sovereignty and majesty of
God. God, out of love, planned the universe to the end of time, selecting
some (the elect) for salvation. Faith binds the believer to Christ and
permits him to follow his or her calling--in other words the way that God
planned for him or her. This is the reason for the seriousness of
Calvinists, or Puritans, as they were known in England. Everyone had to
work hard to find out God's plan for himself or herself, and follow that
calling faithfully. Calvinists made the conversion experience central to
their spiritual life. As an adult, the Calvinists had to experience a
moment when they felt God's saving grace working in them, and when they
discovered God's plan for their lives. Only with such an experience, and
a convincing account of that experience before the church elders, could a
Calvinist become a full member of the church.
The English Reformation
Nowhere was the political aspect of the Reformation more apparent than in
England, where the king who wrote a pamphlet against Martin Luther in defense
of the seven sacraments was the same king who ended up taking control of the
church away from the Pope and abolishing the monasteries. The Pope had
political reasons to deny Henry VIII a divorce, and Henry had political reasons
to take matters into his own hands. Henry's confrontation with the Pope
was nothing really new, but the popularity of Reformation ideas in England made
it possible for Henry to go much further than he might otherwise have
gone. Luther had said, after all, that only secular rulers had authority
in secular affairs--even the secular affairs of the church--and this is
precisely the argument that Henry needed.
Thomas More was a friend of the King, and his Lord Chancellor during the
divorce crisis. The king thought that More's humanism would make him
willing to support the king against the Pope. More did not oppose Henry
on the ground that divorce was wrong, but on the ground that it was
presumptuous and dangerous for the king to make himself head of the
church. More could not accept Luther or Henry's belief in the supremacy
of secular rulers in church affairs. Henry had More put on trial, and
false evidence was used to convict him of treason. He was beheaded in
1535.
Under Henry's daughter, Elizabeth I, a list of 39 articles of belief for the
Church of England were enacted, which contained elements of Lutheran, Calvinist
and Catholic theology. The Church of England became a sort of
moderate Protestantism which included different beliefs and practices within
itself. That did not mean that conflict was ended; there was sometimes
more and sometimes less tolerance of a given tendency at different times.
Calvinists in the Church of England found their beliefs and practices less and
less tolerated in the Church by the early 1600s, and starting with the
Mayflower, they began immigrating to America in large numbers. The
flexible Protestantism of England did succeed, however, in preserving England
from the worst kind of religious civil wars that much of the rest Europe
suffered in the century following Luther's revolt.
Protestantism was a mix of theological and political motives. The movement
was divided and entangled with political concerns. Protestant ideas opened new avenues for opportunistic rulers
of different sorts to leverage new power. On the other hand, Protestant optimism that better knowledge of
the Bible would unlock a new era in the Christian life inspired both new faith
and new fanaticism. Protestants in general believed the historic church was superfluous
and corrupt. Protestants argued that
the faithful stood individually and collectively before God and Bible rather
than the Pope and the priesthood. The
ideas of “salvation by faith” and of a “priesthood of all believers” suggested
a new sort of spiritual freedom from the church that many found liberating,
while others though exceedingly misguided presumptuous, not to mention
political dangerous.