Return to Guidebook Contents  |  WSU Writing Web

Academic Integrity and Plagiarism

1. Ethics of Writing

An ethic is defined in the Webster's II New Riverside University Dictionary as "a principle of right or good behavior." Ethics play a part in every action of everyday life and must carry over into writing. According to one textbook used for ENG 101 and 102, The Call to Write, ethical principles are fundamental to good writing. It states that writers should:
  • "be trustworthy, using the best information available and presenting it accurately"
  • "be honest, acknowledging the sources of their information"
  • "be fair, treating opposing views seriously"
  • "keep in mind the best interests of individuals and groups they write about"
  • "be reasonable, approaching their readers to persuade rather than manipulate them"

 

In academic writing, these ethical principles are usually brought together under the term "Academic Integrity." Faculty expect students to be trustworthy and honest, presenting work as their own and acknowledging the work of others; to be fair by acknowledging others’ work and writing; and to avoid manipulating their readers, either through rhetoric or through academic dishonesty. In writing courses, the most common ethical lapse is plagiarism.

Top of Page


2. Plagiarism

Plagiarism can take different forms:

Cheating: Submitting work that you did not write as your own. This includes (but isn’t limited to) books, essays, newspapers and magazines, World Wide Web sites, and papers written by other students, either from Wright State or elsewhere. It is also considered cheating to submit a paper you wrote for one class in another--in college or in high school--without the instructor’s permission.

Non-attribution: Copying passages exactly from another’s work without citing it and indicating (through quotation marks or block indentations) that it has been copied from another source.

Patchwriting: Writing passages that have been borrowed from another’s work but changed somewhat in wording, phrasing, or grammar. Patchwriting constitutes plagiarism even if the original source is acknowledged. When you are paraphrasing the work of another writer, put the ideas into your own sentences; patchwriting occurs when you follow too closely the structure as well as the wording of the original.

In other words, give full credit to the words and ideas of others by citing those sources as completely as possible, using the documentation style required. Students who are unsure whether a particular act constitutes plagiarism should consult their instructor.

You need to know the rules. Those who violate campus rules regarding academic misconduct are subject to disciplinary sanctions, including probation, suspension and dismissal. Non-attribution and Patchwriting, however, may result from unfamiliarity with challenging material or the conventions of academic writing, so appropriate instruction and a request for subsequent revision of the paper may be an appropriate response. They may also reflect an intent to deceive, in which case the disciplinary sanctions will apply.

Top of Page

3. The Importance of Academic Integrity

In practice, in writing courses this means that you should not take credit for the work of others. In other words, do not submit work as your own that you did not write.

Why is this so important, though? People use other people’s writing all the time--people ghostwrite speeches and articles for others--and nobody seems to care; why do faculty get so upset about it? There are two reasons.

First, in a classroom, presenting work as your own that someone else did is fraud. The university calls it "plagiarism," but it’s fraud: an attempt to deceive the faculty member, to get something--a grade--that you didn’t earn. In a content course, a fraudulent paper forces the faculty to doubt whether the student learned the content; in a writing course, a fraudulent paper makes assessing the student’s writing ability impossible.

Second, faculty believe that the goal of academic work is for students to gain an education that a degree represents. They value learning, and the credentials (grades, degrees, etc.) are evidence of that value. Academic fraud, though, sends the message that the content of a university course is irrelevant--the only thing that matters is the grade or the certificate, no matter how meaningless. It’s justified as "playing the game," but faculty see it as trivializing what they’ve devoted their working lives to and emptying students’ degrees of meaning.

Top of Page

4. Academic Integrity Policy

On May 2, 2000, the Faculty Senate of Wright State approved an Academic Integrity policy. It reads as follows:

It is the policy of Wright State University to uphold and support standards of personal honesty and integrity for all students consistent with the goals of a community of scholars and students seeking knowledge and truth. Furthermore, it is the policy of the university to enforce these standards through fair and objective procedures governing instances of alleged dishonesty, cheating, and other academic misconduct.

Top of Page

Academic Integrity Policy and Process

The judicial process for violations of academic integrity is activated whenever an undergraduate or graduate student is accused of violating Section --, Category 4 A/B of the Code of Student Conduct pertaining to academic integrity. Students who are participating in a professional practice program may be held accountable to additional standards and should refer to all relevant policies and procedures pertaining to their particular school or college. Any member of the community may report an alleged violation. A violation may be reported to the instructor of the course in which the alleged act occurred, the Chair or Dean (or equivalent academic administrator) of the college/school with which the course is affiliated, or a member of the staff of the Office of Judicial Affairs. An individual who suspects a student of cheating may at any time contact the Office of Judicial Affairs at 775-4240 to receive assistance with any aspect of the academic integrity process. All reports must be in written form to be adjudicated.

A student accused of a violation of academic dishonesty is not permitted to drop or withdraw from the course giving rise to the charge of academic dishonesty unless the matter is resolved in the student’s favor. Once notified by the professor, the office of Judicial Affairs is responsible for notifying the Registrar that there is an alleged violation being considered. If the alleged violation cannot be resolved prior to the date upon which final grades must be reported to the registrar, the instructor of the class, with the advice and counsel of the department chair or equivalent will assign a grade of "N".

In the event that a student is exonerated as a result of an academic integrity investigation, the student may choose to either complete the course, with the opportunity to make up any work missed, or withdraw from the course without any notation of the course on the student’s academic transcript.

When a student is suspected of committing an act of academic dishonesty must utilize the procedures listed below.

1. Faculty-Student Conference Procedures

The faculty member will document the alleged violation utilizing an Academic
Integrity Violation Form. The faculty member will then send the student an
Academic Integrity Conference Notification Form to notify the student of
the allegations and the need for a meeting to discuss the incident. A copy of the
Academic Integrity Violation Form should be included with the Notification Form.

Either the student or the faculty member may invite the department chair (or equivalent
academic administrator) to attend the conference. If the student chooses to not
schedule or attend their meeting with the faculty member, the faculty member, in the
student’s absence, shall make a decision as to whether the student is responsible or not
for the violation using all available information. Furthermore, upon receipt of the
documentation, the Office of Judicial Affairs will bill a $25.00 non-compliance fee to
the student’s Bursar account and he/she will be referred to the Academic Integrity
Hearing Panel (AIHP) for consideration of further sanctioning.

If, as a result of the meeting with the student, the faculty member believes that no
violation took place, the faculty member will dismiss the case and the issue will be
considered resolved. Both judicial forms regarding the incident should be destroyed.
However, if after discussing the incident with the student, the faculty member still
believes that "more likely than not" a violation did occur, the faculty member determines
whether the student should receive a zero for the assignment, examination, paper or
project, or a grade of "F" for the course. 

If the student and faculty member agree that both a violation took place and the sanction imposed is appropriate, the faculty member will complete the Academic Integrity Resolution Form documenting the mutually agreed-upon outcome. The student will then be asked to sign the Resolution Form indicating that the information on the form is an accurate reflection of the
decision(s) made during the meeting. A completed copy of the Resolution Form will be
provided to the student. Additionally, the faculty member should retain his or her copy
and forward all remaining copies of all forms to the Office of Judicial Affairs.

If, after reviewing all of the information the faculty member believes that the seriousness
of the incident warrants additional action beyond a grade sanction, the Resolution Form
should be filled indicating that the case will be referred to the AIHP for further
sanctioning. Furthermore, any student who has previously been found responsible for
committing an act of academic dishonesty according to the records maintained within
the Office of Judicial Affairs will also be referred to the AIHP for further sanctioning.

In the event that the student denies the charge(s) and/or does not accept the faculty
member’s sanction during the initial meeting with the faculty member, the faculty
member will inform the student that the case will be forwarded to the AIHP for
adjudication. The faculty member will then complete the Academic Integrity Resolution
Form indicating a referral to the AIHP, have the student sign the form, and provide the
student with his/her copy. All remaining documentation is then sent to the Office of
Judicial Affairs. The Office of Judicial Affairs is responsible for the scheduling of the
hearing.

For information on hearings and further actions, see the appropriate section of the Student Handbook.

 

Top of Page  |  Return to Guidebook Table of Contents