English 251: The Study of Literature II
Spring 2000: T Th 2:00-3:40pm, 172 Millett
Barry Milligan: 472 Millett; 775-4805 (messages: 775-
3136); 
barry.milligan@wright.edu
Office Hours: T Th 12:30-1:15 and 4:00-5:00; other 
times by appt.
 
The process of interpretation is neither arbitrary nor 
abstract; it is a central and necessary vital function, by 
which we seek so to understand our environment that we can 
live more successfully in it.
                                          --Raymond Williams
Objectives:
The English 250/251 sequence is designed to develop a firm 
foundation in interpretive, analytical, communicative, and 
argumentative skills that are essential not only for the study of 
literature but also for functioning in the world as a 
sophisticated critical thinker.  Our goals this term will be to 
build upon the groundwork laid in English 250 (close-reading 
skills, critical vocabulary, facility with basic forms of written 
literary argument), by:
Prerequisites: 
The prerequisite for this course is English 250 or one of the 
255/256 sequence (no longer offered).  If you accidentally 
registered for English 251 without having successfully completed 
one of these prerequisites, then you need to drop English 251 and 
enroll in English 250 instead. 

Texts:
Gibaldi, Joseph.  MLA Handbook for Writers of Research Papers. 
        5th ed. New York: Modern Language Association, 1999.
Griffith, Kelley. Writing Essays About Literature: A Guide and
        Style Sheet. 5th ed. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace College 
        Publishers, 1998.
Hawthorne, Nathaniel. Young Goodman Brown and Other Short
        Stories. New York: Dover, 1992.
de Maupassant, Guy. The Necklace and Other Short Stories. New 
        York: Dover, 1992.
Murfin, Ross, ed. Heart of Darkness: Complete Authoritative Text
        with Biographical and Historical Contexts, Critical History,
        and Essays from Five Contemporary Critical Perspectives. 2nd 
        ed. Boston: Bedford-St. Martin's, 1996.
Murfin, Ross and Supriya M. Ray. The Bedford Glossary of Critical
        and Literary Terms. Boston: Bedford, 1997.
Poe, Edgar Allan. The Gold-Bug and Other Tales. New York: Dover, 
        1991.
Ward, Candace, ed. Great Short Stories by American Women. New 
        York: Dover, 1996.

Requirements:
Interpretive Exercises: For most reading assignments listed on 
the schedule below, you will see there are corresponding 
"interpretive exercises," which are designed to increase your 
understanding of key concepts and ability to apply them to 
specific interpretive situations. These exercises will include 
short written responses (written before we meet on the day for 
which the exercise is assigned), which will be collected at the 
end of class.  They also will often require that you mark 
examples of a specific concept in your text (always read with a 
pencil in your hand!), so you should be prepared to provide such 
examples promptly if called upon during class discussion. Only 
those written responses completed on time and submitted in class 
will receive credit, which will figure as a portion of your 
participation grade (see below).  "Right" answers are not 
necessarily as important as a solid grasp of the concepts 
covered.  You should of course attend to grammar, spelling, 
punctuation, etc. (as always), and your responses should be 
typed, but my written comments after the first assignment will 
usually be limited to a check, check-, or a 0 at the top of the 
page, indicating full credit, half credit, or no credit.  If you 
find that you still do not understand a concept addressed in an 
interpretive exercise after we have discussed it in class, you 
should see me as soon as possible (in some instances, I will 
indicate on your written response that you need to see me); much 
of the material covered in these exercises is cumulative and the 
chain will be only as strong as its weakest link, as the cliché 
has it.
Examinations: An examination covering concepts related to the 
formal analysis of fiction will be given at approximately mid-
term (see the schedule below).  A sample exam will be distributed 
and discussed in class before the actual exam as a study aid.  
Toward the end of the term, you will be given a selection of 
essay topics regarding critical approaches from which you will 
choose two as the subjects of short essays (approx. 500 words 
each) to be submitted as a take-home exam on the day scheduled 
for the final exam.
Essays: The first assigned essay, due the fifth week of the term, 
will analyze a particular formal aspect of a short story (details 
will be discussed in class and on a separate handout).  The final 
essay will make use of (a) one or more of the critical 
perspectives we have explored together, (b) the vocabulary for 
discussing formal aspects of narrative developed in the early 
portion of the course, and (c) the kinds of secondary sources 
emphasized in the library and research component of the course 
(again, more details will follow).  The final essay will be due 
on the due date indicated (see the schedule below).  Drafts of 
both papers will be submitted for credit.  My written comments on 
these drafts will focus on the viability of your thesis and 
appropriateness of the support you offer. For consultation on 
matters that reach beyond these basics, I will be available for 
individual conferences both inside and outside of class.
Annotated Bibliography: As partial preparation for the final 
critical essay, you will read and evaluate works of literary 
criticism pertaining to the work of fiction you plan to write 
about.  Your entries (at least five) will be expected to meet the 
criteria explained in a separate handout.
Participation: You will begin the term with a participation grade 
of 100 points.  However, 10 points will be deducted for (a) each 
failure to submit a satisfactory written component of an 
interpretive exercise in class (see above) and/or (b) each clear 
instance of unpreparedness (e.g., failure promptly to provide a 
suitable example, when called upon, of a concept addressed in the 
dayís interpretive exercise). Up to 25 points will be deducted 
for failure to submit a satisfactory preliminary draft by its due 
date (i.e., failure to submit a draft at all by the due date will 
result in a full 25-point deduction; a draft submitted on-time 
but displaying other shortcomings will result in partial 
deductions). Anyone with a participation grade of zero or less at 
the end of the term will automatically receive an F for the 
course.

Grades:
Final grades will be based on the following weights:
In-Class Exam:                  15%
Take-Home Exam:                 15%
Analysis Essay:                 20%
Final Essay:                    25%
Annotated Bibliography:         10%
Participation:                  15%

Schedule: 
Note: all assignments are to be completed before class on the day 
for which they are listed.

Tu 3/28 Course Introduction

Th 3/30 "What is Interpretation?," etc. (Griffith 8-13); 
"Analyzing Fiction" (Griffith 27-35, 40-48 [i.e., skip 
"Theme" for now); "point of view" (Murfin and Ray 291-
93); Poe, "The Tell-Tale Heart" (74-79); "Writing About 
Literature" (Griffith 153-55) 
        Interpretive Exercise: complete the following exercises 
with regard to "The Tell-Tale Heart": nos. 1, 3 
(Griffith 32); no. 7 (Griffith 35); nos. 5, 7, 10 
(Griffith 44); no. 1 (Griffith 48).
                *** TOPICS FOR ESSAY #1 DISTRIBUTED ***

Tu 4/4  "Irony" and "Symbolism" (Griffith 48-55); "irony," 
"metaphor," "symbol" and "symbolism" (Murfin and Ray 
176-83, 210-11, 391-93, 393-94); Hawthorne, "Young 
Goodman Brown" (24-34); "Documentation: Preparing the 
List of Works Cited" (Gibaldi 104-182; skim the samples 
but know what they are and where to find them again 
when you need them)
                Interpretive Exercise: complete the following exercises 
with regard to "Young Goodman Brown": nos. 2-3 
(Griffith 51); nos. 1-3 (Griffith 54). 
                *** SAMPLE EXAM DISTRIBUTED ***

Th 4/6  **** CLASS CANCELLED ****
        
Tu 4/11 "Theme" (Griffith 35-39); "theme" and "motif" (Murfin 
and Ray 400, 224-25); "Specialized Approaches. . ." 
through "Biographical Criticism" and "New Criticism" 
(Griffith 123-26, 133-35); "formalism" and "New 
Criticism" (Murfin and Ray 132-33, 237-38); "Choosing 
Topics" (Griffith 157-68); "Documentation: Citing 
Sources in the Text" (Gibaldi 183-205; again, skim the 
samples)
Interpretive Exercise: (a) complete the following 
exercises with respect to "Young Goodman Brown": 
nos. 1, 5, 7 (Griffith 39); (b) identify a 
prominent motif, mark its appearances in the text, 
and briefly explain how it contributes to the 
development of a theme (support your assertions 
with specific examples cited parenthetically in 
MLA style); (c) write a short paragraph briefly 
explaining in your own words the defining points 
of the New Criticism
NOTE: begin brainstorming, freewriting, etc. on one of 
the topics for essay #1
                
Th 4/13 **** CLASS CANCELLED ****

Tu 4/18 Hurston, "Sweat" (Ward 182-93); "The Argumentative 
Nature of Interpretive Essays" and "The Structure of 
Essays About Literature" (Griffith 175-80); "Guidelines 
for Writing First Drafts" (Griffith 180-91); sample 
student essays (Griffith 272-74 and handout)
Interpretive Exercise: Briefly analyze one of the 
following elements in "Sweat," supporting your 
claims with specific examples from the text cited 
parenthetically according to MLA style:
1) character
2) external conflict
3) internal conflict
4) setting
5) point of view
6) irony
7) a specific motif as a metaphor or symbol

Th 4/20 **** EXAM ****

Tu 4/25         "Psychological Criticism" (Griffith 128-30); "What Is 
Psychoanalytic Criticism?" (Beidler 207-16); Poe, "The 
Fall of the House of Usher" (14-29) 
                Interpretive Exercise: Using "The Fall of the House of 
Usher" as a basis, answer the following questions:
a) As both overview essays make clear, Poe has 
figured prominently in various strains of 
psychological criticism. How would you account 
for this?
b) If Freud is right that creative utterances are 
packed with displaced unconscious material 
much as dreams are, what specific things does 
Roderickís very strange song (21-22) tell us 
about his unconscious?
c) The narrator himself suspects that his 
impressions "must have been a dream" (16). If 
you equate the narrator with Poe himself 
(always a dangerous line of argument but a 
potentially fruitful line of inquiry), what 
hypotheses are you led to formulate about 
Poeís unconscious? 
Many readers have been convinced that Roderick and 
Madeline have been involved in an incestuous 
relationship. What does such an interpretation 
potentially tell you about the readers who offer it?
        Writing Workshop: bring 2 copies of your completed first 
draft (formatted in MLA style, with parenthetical 
citations, headings, works cited page, etc.; use MLA 
sample pages, Gibaldi 264-65, for review and guidance) 
for conferences with peers and instructor 
        NOTES: (a) remember that failure to submit a substantial and 
correctly formatted first draft today will count 
against your participation grade (see ìRequirementsî 
above); (b) begin reading Conrad, ìHeart of Darkness" 
(Murfin 17-95), which is long and due to be finished Th 
5/4.
                *** FIRST DRAFT OF ESSAY #1 DUE ***
                
Th 4/27 "Reader-Response Criticism" (Griffith 139-41); "What Is 
Reader-Response Criticism?" (Murfin 115-27); Fish, 
"Literature in the Reader" (excerpt in handout); 
Freeman, "A New England Nun" (Ward 62-72); handout: 
final essay assignment
                Interpretive Exercise: Read the first paragraph of "A 
New England Nun" one sentence at a time, 
imagining, if you can, that you have read no 
further. Pay close attention to what the text does 
to you by answering the following questions after 
finishing each sentence:
(a) What questions does the sentence raise?
(b) What answers to those questions does it 
suggest and/or how does the current sentence 
modify/reinforce the impressions you had 
after concluding the previous sentence?
(c) Where would you have believed the story was 
going had you read no further than this?
What aspects of your education, socio-economic profile, 
gender, ethnicity, etc. might make you more likely to 
see these questions and answers in the text than a 
reader with a different background?
*** IN CLASS: INTRODUCTION TO LIBRARY RESEARCH ***

Tu 5/2  "Research Papers . . . ," etc. (Griffith 193-208); 
"Using the Library . . ." through "Taking Notes" 
(Gibaldi 2-25); handout re: annotated bibliography; 
"Revising and Editing" (Griffith 241-61)        
        NOTE: revise your essay #1 for final submission.
X               CLASS MEETS IN 241/242 DUNBAR LIBRARY TODAY                W
*** FINAL DRAFT OF ESSAY #1 DUE ***

Th 5/4  Conrad, "Heart of Darkness" (Murfin 17-95) 
Interpretive Exercise: (a) Do a slow-motion analysis of 
Conrad's first paragraph as you did with "A New 
England Nun" (i.e., referencing Conrad's text 
instead of Freeman's, answer the questions posed 
in the interpretive exercise for 4/27)

Tu 5/9  Rabinowitz, "Reader Response, Reader Responsibility" 
(Murfin 131-47)
                Interpretive Exercise: what points do you find 
especially (a) convincing and (b) unconvincing in 
Rabinowitz's argument and why?
                *** ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY DUE ***

Th 5/11         "New Historicist Criticism" (Griffith 141-46); "new 
historicism" (Murfin and Ray 238-44); "What is the New 
Historicism?" (Murfin 221-38); Maupassant, 
"Mademoiselle Fifi" (63-72); handout on Franco-Prussian 
War, etc.; "Sample Research Paper" (Griffith 231-39)
Interpretive Exercise: Answer the following questions 
with respect to "Mademoiselle Fifi" and its 
accompanying handout:
a) How does the thumbnail information in the 
handout illuminate the story?
b) How does the story illuminate the information 
in the handout?
c) What questions are you still left with after 
reading the texts together?
d) What answers to those questions might you 
hypothesize from where you stand now, and how 
would you go about verifying them?
e) How do you think your position with respect to 
history, socio-demographics, ethnicity, 
gender, etc. has influenced the questions and 
answers you have raised here?  How might your 
questions and answers have differed had you 
read this story as a French citizen when it 
was first published in 1882, as a German one 
at the same time, as an ethnic Albanian in 
modern Kosovo . . . ?

Tu 5/16 "Structuralism and Post-Structuralism" (Griffith 135-
39); "What Is Deconstruction?" (Murfin 185-205); review 
"Drafting the Essay" (Griffith 175-91); Maupassant, 
"The Horla" (100-19)
                Interpretive Exercise: answer the following questions 
with respect to "The Horla":
a) What binary oppositions figure prominently in 
the narrative (e.g., visible/invisible, 
conscious/unconscious)?
b) How are those oppositions established (e.g., 
where in the narrative is something visible 
directly opposed to something invisible)?
c) How are they broken down (e.g., where is the 
distinction between consciousness and 
unconsciousness blurred)?
NOTE: you should now be drafting your final essay.

Th 5/18         Miller, "Heart of Darkness Revisited" (Murfin 206-20)
                Interpretive Exercise: what points do you find 
especially (a) convincing and (b) unconvincing in 
Miller's argument and why?
NOTE: continue drafting your final essay.
*** TAKE-HOME ESSAY TOPICS DISTRIBUTED *** 

Tu 5/23 "Social Criticism" (Griffith 126-28); "What Is Cultural 
Criticism?" (Murfin 258-77); handout
                Interpretive Exercise: Answer the following questions 
with reference to the texts on the handout:
a) How does each represent and/or respond to the 
idea of childhood?
b) What does each text suggest about the culture 
from which it emerges?  Does it seem to 
support or oppose the norms you would usually 
impute to its culture?  In what ways?
                NOTE: continue drafting your final essay.

Th 5/25 Brantlinger, "Heart of Darkness: Anti-Imperialism, 
Racism, or Impressionism?" (Murfin 277-98)
                Interpretive Exercise: what points do you find 
especially (a) convincing and (b) unconvincing in 
Brantlinger's argument and why?
                NOTE: continue drafting your final essay.

Tu 5/30 "Feminist and Gender Criticism" (Griffith 146-50); 
"What Are Feminist and Gender Criticism?" (Murfin 148-
69); Gilman, "The Yellow Wall-Paper" (Ward 74-88); 
review "Revising and Editing" (Griffith 241-61)
Interpretive Exercise: answer the following questions 
with regard to "The Yellow Wall-Paper":
a) What gender stereotypes do you find in the 
narrative and where do you find them (if 
gender stereotypes donít immediately come to 
mind, see Griffithís second paragraph on 148)?
b) Are those stereotypes endorsed or critiqued by 
the narrative and how?
c) Is there an example in Gilman's text of 
especially feminine writing/language?  If so, 
what is the example and what about it is 
especially feminine?  If not, point to an 
example that might question the idea of 
feminine writing/language.
d) What about your experience of this story might 
suggest you are "reading like a woman" or 
"reading like a man?"  (Note: you might 
believe you are a man reading like a woman or 
vice versa.) 
Writing Workshop: bring a clean copy of your completed 
first draft (formatted in MLA style, with 
parenthetical citations, headings, works cited 
page, etc.; use MLA sample pages, Gibaldi 264-65, 
for review and guidance) for conferences with 
peers and instructor 
                *** FIRST DRAFT OF FINAL ESSAY DUE ***          

Th 6/1  Smith, "'Too Beautiful Altogether'" (Murfin 169-84) 
                Interpretive Exercise: what points do you find 
especially (a) convincing and (b) unconvincing in 
Smith's argument and why?
                *** FINAL DRAFT OF FINAL ESSAY DUE ***

****: (final exam date; no class) 
                *** TAKE-HOME ESSAYS DUE BY 5 PM IN MY MAILBOX ***

Return to Dr. Milligan's Home Page

Return to the English Department Syllabus Page