Humanities 720
Graduate Introduction to Humanities II

Professor Carol Loranger                                   7-9:50pm M
414 Millett / 775-2961                                     182 Millett
Office: 5-7pm M / appt.
email: carol.loranger@wright.edu
newsgroup: wright.hum.humanities720-01



Required Text – Buy this edition only:
Melville, Billy Budd, Sailor (An Inside Narrative). Ed. 
Harrison Hayford and Merton M. Sealts, Jr. Chicago: Univ. 
Chicago Pr., 1962.
Readings on Reserve (password: hum720)

Useful Internet Sites
     Dunbar Reserve: http://wsuol2.wright.edu/search/r?SEARCH=hum720
A Melville clearinghouse: http://www.melville.org
Our Newsgroup: wright.hum.humanities720-01
Calendar
March 29    Introductory Matters—about this course—my 
            expectations—your expectations. A brief introduction 
            to Herman Melville and Billy Budd, Sailor (An Inside 
            Narrative).
April 5     Read/Discuss Billy Budd. Structural questions. 
            Problems of interpretation. First short paper—reader’s 
            response to Billy Budd due.
            Provocations 1 and 2 due online by noon Friday, April 9.
April 12    Read/Discuss  “Justice in Billy Budd” and “Billy 
            Budd: Criticism as Assault on Authority.” Responses 1 
            and 2 due.
April 19    In-Class Viewing/Discussion of Peter Ustinov’s Billy Budd.
            Provocations 3 and 4 due online by noon Friday, April 23.
April 26    Read/Discuss “Billy Budd: An Allegory on the 
            Rights of Man” and “Billy Budd and the Judgment of 
            Silence.” Responses 3 and 4 due.
            Provocations 5 and 6 due online by noon Friday, April 30.
May 3       Read/Discuss “Cataloguing the Creatures of the Deep” 
            and “The Somers Mutiny and Billy Budd.” Responses 5 
            and 6 due.
            Provocations 7 and 8 due online by noon Friday, May 7.
May 10      Read/Discuss “The Dilemma of Nature and Culture: 
            Billy Budd as Problem Novel” and “Billy Budd: 
            According to Nature.” Responses 7 and 8 due.
May 17      Read/Discuss “Synopsis.” In-Class Viewing/Discussion 
            Benjamin Britten’s Billy Budd.
May 24      Read/Discuss “Britten’s Billy Budd.” In-Class 
            Viewing/Discussion Benjamin Britten’s Billy Budd 
            continued.  Read/Discuss  “Melville’s Fist: The 
            Execution of Billy Budd”
May 31      Memorial Day—No Class. Take a break and re-read 
            Melville’s Billy Budd.
June 7 Seminar paper due.



Work
Reading: Although there is only one course text, we will be 
reading selected articles approaching Billy Budd from 
varying disciplinary angles, including law, natural 
science, sociology, art and literary criticism. Although 
you will only be asked to write directly about one of these 
articles, it is essential that you read all of them in a 
timely fashion. The articles are on on-line reserve in the 
Dunbar Library, which means that you can access and 
download them via computers on campus or at work or home. A
single hard copy of each article is also available on 2-
hour reserve.
Writing:  I’m asking you to write a short (1000-1200 word)
interpretive response to Billy Budd during the week that
you read it, before we infect each other in discussion.
Additionally, you will write a very short (750-1000 word)
provocation based on the reserve reading assigned to you.
This will be posted to our newsgroup by noon Friday BEFORE
the due date for the assigned reading, so that some of your
fellow seminar-ians will have time to write feisty
rejoinders. You will have the opportunity to write 1 or 2
of these feisty rejoinders (250-500 words) and read them
aloud in class to help guide our night’s discussion. Our
lengthier seminar papers (2500-3750 words) will address
Melville, Melville’s reputation and/or Melville’s Billy
Budd from a disciplinary angle of your choice and will
include a broad overview of contemporary disciplinary
theory or practice and some awareness of the body of
relevant Billy Budd/Melville scholarship along with some
specific treatment of the text itself. While the overall
shape of this essay is open to creative approaches,
documentation should conform to MLA guidelines and the
paper reflect graduate-level English composition and
thinking skills.

Return to the English Department Syllabus Page

Return to Dr. Loranger's Home Page