Proposal for a Special Issue of Gender & Society
African American Women:
Gender Relations, Work, and The Political Economy in
The Twenty-First Century
Marlese Durr, Associate
Professor, Wright State University
Shirley A. Hill, Associate
Professor, University of Kansas
Theme and Rationale
Over the past few decades, there has been a remarkable
expansion of scholarship by and about African American women. Much of
this research was sparked by the now-infamous Moynihan Report (1965),
which attributed family instability and poverty among African Americans
to their failure to establish patriarchal families. According to Moynihan,
female-headed families were inherently pathological, since they were bereft
of male authority and economic provision. The Moynihan thesis generated
considerable controversy among scholars, especially in the context of
the civil rights and women’s movements. In the succeeding years, studies
by Allen (1978, 1979), Billingsley (1968), Hill (1972), Ladner (1971),
Stack (1972) and Gutman (1976) were notable in helping us understand that
social and structural factors–such as slavery, racism, discrimination,
and systematic exclusion—had shaped the family arrangements of African
Americans. Moreover, much of the revisionist research of the civil rights
era defended Black families as strong, viable, and well-functioning entities
and challenged the presumed superiority of the breadwinner-homemaker family
model. Within that context Black women, especially those who were heading
their own households, were defined as independent, strong, and even "liberated,"
and gender relations among Black women and men were seen as fairly egalitarian
(Scanzoni, 1972).
Interest in how social structural factors shape the social
construction of gender led directly to research on the diverse work experiences
of women based on their race and class location. Working-class, poor,
and/or women of color have historically had to combine their work and
family roles, while middle-class White women were expected to confine
their energies to the home. Work has been central in structuring the family
and gender roles of African American women. Researchers such as Bonnie
T. Dill (1986), Paula Giddings (1984) and Jacqueline Jones (1985), for
example, focused on how work had broadened Black women’s concept of womanhood,
and they highlighted the dynamic relationship between the work, family,
and gender roles. These researchers claimed that the work roles of Black
women were essential to the survival of families, and thus a source of
female power and authority in families. Collins (1990:24) includes work,
family experience, and culture in her list of factors that have produced
a distinctive feminist standpoint, or consciousness, among Black women.
The work experiences of Black women, however, were uniquely structured
by gender, race, and class barriers--an observation that led Deborah King
(1988) to advocate a "multiple jeopardies" framework in understanding
the inequalities faced by Black women. Multicultural feminism has now
become a key framework in articulating the experience as Black women since,
as Rose Brewer notes "gender takes on meaning and is embedded institutionally
in the context of the racial and class order" (1993:19)
Black feminists have now created an impressive legacy
of research that explains the roles of African American women in the "race
and class order" of the society. Race, class, and gender have shaped
the work experiences of Black people and, subsequently, their family systems
and gender behaviors. Much of this analysis, however, remains rooted in
the research of the 1970s, and thus has been less attentive to contemporary
economic transformations and opportunity structures, and their impact
on gender and families. For example, we now know a great deal about how
structural forces and ideologies such as slavery, racism, legalized segregation
and exclusion have historically shaped the roles of Black women, but we
are just beginning to explore how contemporary forces such as equal opportunity,
affirmative action, welfare reform, and class mobility are changing and/or
redefining gender expectations and families.
In addition, some researchers are "revising the
revisionists" of the 1970s by taking a closer look at the contention
of historic gender equality among Blacks. Franklin (1997), for example,
focuses on strident efforts by African American men to create patriarchal
families even before the end of slavery—often with adverse consequences
for their families, especially women, In Too Heavy a Lord (1999)
Deborah White also challenges conventional wisdom about gender equality
among Blacks. In her exploration of Black women’s participation in clubs
and political organizations, she documents the vying for power between
Black men and women during the civil rights era, with men often asserting
the necessity of male leadership. Revisionist studies like these provide
a suitable framework for analyzing contemporary gender dynamics among
African Americans. How are the gender roles and identities of African
American women being renegotiated and reconfigured in the context of current
economic and policy changes? To what extent to do gender and race still
structure the opportunity system for Black people, and how do they manage
racism and sexism on the job? And how are these changes affecting their
roles in families and personal relationships?
Emerging Scholarship: New Questions, New Directions
Multicultural feminism contends that gender is shaped
by race and class, and thus would predict that gender is dynamic, being
reshaped, renegotiated, and redefined in the context of social structural
forces. The last half of the twentieth century has witnessed significant
shifts in traditional social structures based on gender and race. The
politics of the 1960s, especially as captured by the civil rights and
women’s movements, led to the passage of equal opportunity and affirmative
action policies designed to provide greater opportunities for women and
racial minorities. College attendance increased among African Americans
during the civil rights era, followed by a gradual increase in the number
occupying high-level occupations. A decade later, however, economic transitions
such as deindustrialization and public policy changes such as drastic
cuts in welfare were undermining the employment and marriage prospects
of a significant percentage of Black people, creating what many have referred
to as an "underclass." Thus, a significant class polarization
occurred among Black people between 1974 and 1994, with an increase in
the percentage earning less than $15,000 and of those earning more than
$75,000 (Hurst, 1998). While there are core experiences that link African
Americans together, their economic, family, and lived experiences are
increasingly diverse.
As we have shown earlier, there is a dynamic interplay
between work, family, and gender: that is, they are social structures
which operate interactively (Giddings, 1984; Jones, 1985; Zinn and Eitzen,
1999). What are the gender implications of evolving patterns of work and
family among African Americans? How are changing patterns of work reconfiguring,
challenging, or being mediated by the historic gender expectations of
African American women and men? Scholars are already beginning to explore
these issues. Black men, for example, are increasingly gaining entry into
high-level positions in major White-owned corporations (Collins, 1998;
Freeman, 1981; Farley, 1984), often acquiring the resources that traditionally
have produced male dominance. Some recent studies continue to show gender
equality as the norm in Black families (Blee and Tickamyer, 1995; John,
Shelton, and Luschen, 1995), although class mobility is also correlated
with family structures that cast women into traditional domestic roles.
Black women, concentrated occupationally in domestic work as late as 1960,
are now better represented in managerial and professional occupations
(Durr and Logan, 1997). Middle-class Black women often face a unique form
of "gendered racism" in the workplace (St. Jean and Feagin,
1998). Menaghan (1991) tells us that workplace conditions—such as work
overload, job loss, poor earnings, low opportunity for problem-solving—can
adversely affect the quality of marriage and family life. In addition,
while the overall rate of labor force participation for Black and White
women is now nearly the same, Black married mothers of infants (70%) are
still more likely than their White counterparts (59%) to be employed.
Paralleling the movement of some African Americans into
high level occupations is the declining status of others due to deindustrialization,
job loss, and welfare reform policies. How has economic decline affected
gender relationships and Black families? Perhaps the best known research
on this issue has been by Wilson (1997), who suggests that structural
changes in the economy have produced cultural changes in gender norms
in ways that have reduced the authority and power of women. Wilson contends
that the very scarcity of men and absence of marriage opportunities heighten
the exploitation of women. While focusing on their adaptability, Jarrett
(1996) documents conventional family aspirations among low-income mothers,
who want to marry and the sense of stigma they feel over being single
and welfare dependent. It also appears that traditional sources of female
power, such as extended kinship units, are declining. Kaplan (1997) and
others (Ladner and Gourdine, 1984; Rochelle, 1997) report a demise in
the supportiveness of families, which traditionally have been a source
of authority and autonomy for Black women. Thus, there appears to be some
profound changes in traditional gender relations based on patterns of
work. While much research remains to be done, it appears that Black male
joblessness and scarcity, as well as their economic and political advancement,
may redefine gender in ways which undermine the position of women. Many
scholars are beginning to examine how class and class mobility shape gender
identity, how African Americans successfully navigate social institutions,
the impact of the global economy of Black women and their families, and
how gender is being negotiated in personal and family relationships.
Relationship to Gender & Society
Gender & Society seeks to explore and analyze
social and structural forces that create and perpetuate gender inequality,
and to advance feminist theory. In the past years, it has expanded its
inclusion of research on working-class and/or women of color, often through
papers that analyze gender within the context of race and class. The proposed
special edition will bring fresh analyses and insights to the issue of
gender among Black Americans by drawing on research that looks at the
how structural transformations of the post-civil rights are reshaping
gender and research that challenges conventional perspectives on gender.
In this edition, we seek theoretical and conceptual research that highlights
the growing diversity of work and family experiences among Black people.
This volume will advance the articulation of multicultural feminism and
contribute to our understanding of processes of class mobility, family
formation, and racial assimilation.
Special Issue: Focus and Breadth of Research and CALL
for PAPERS
As noted above,
the final decades of the twentieth century brought considerable growth
in scholarship on the historic family and work roles of African American
women, much of it documenting how those roles had shaped their gender
roles and self-identities. As a result of the research by and/or about
Black women, we now have a better understanding of how race and class
have historically shaped their definitions of gender and their roles in
families, the labor market, the community, and the nation. As we enter
the twenty-first century, however, a new array of social structural and
ideological forces are affecting the family and work roles of Black women,
e.g., affirmative action/equal opportunity, welfare reform, low rates
of marriage, deindustrialization and displacement, single mother families,
gay/lesbian families, and growing class diversity.
Our central contentions are that the changing work patterns
and opportunities of the twenty-first century are producing unprecedented
social class diversity among African Americans, and that these social
structural changes are challenging, redefining, and reconfiguring gender
among African Americans. In this special issue of Gender & Society
we seek papers that explore the link between the gender, work, and family
roles of Black women. To that end, the papers in this issue will revolve
around these broad questions
- What are the gender implications for African Americans of major contemporary
economic transformations (e.g., deindustrialization, class mobility,
etc.) and public policies (e.g., affirmative action, welfare reform,
etc.)?
- How are gender, race, and class structuring employment opportunities,
and how are Black women managing and negotiating their dual identities
in the workplace
- How are economic transformations, public policies, and employment
experiences shaping the family and interpersonal relationships of Black
women and men? To what extent are traditional systems of female authority
and autonomy changing, and what are the implications of these changes?
Some examples of questions/topics that papers will
address include (but are not limited to):
- Revisionist analyses of the negotiation of gender among African
Americans in families, interpersonal relationships (broadly defined)
or political organizations;
- Critical appraisals of how race and gender continue to shape employment
opportunities;
- Assessments of how the workplace challenges and/or reinforces
gender and racial stereotypes;
- The influence of employment on the division of domestic work and
family power;
- The impact of welfare reform on the work, marriage, and childbearing
patterns of women;
- The relationship career mobility and gender expectations for men
and women;
- The impact of the global economy on the work and family lives
of Black women;
- Analyses of how Black women negotiate and navigate their "new"
workplaces;
- Changing/continuing patterns of power among Black women in their
communities; and
- Research linking patterns of family violence and work.
Time Frame
To initiate the search for papers and generate thought
about these issues, we have organized a roundtable at the upcoming Association
of Black Sociologists meeting (August 10-12, 2000) to be held in Washington,
D.C. In addition, we plan to distribute the Call for Papers widely to
members of SWS, SSSP, SSSI, ABS, and ASA, and through regional meetings
and personal networks. Listed below is our timetable:
- Call for Papers September/November,
2000
- Manuscript Deadline April 2001
- Review of papers by editors May
2001- August 2001
- Letters of Denial/Acceptance September
2001
- Revisions Due November 2001
- Final Selection/Editing December
2001
- Publication Date Spring 2002
|
Deadline for submission
of manuscripts: April 15, 2001.
Anticipated Publication Date: March 2002
Submit papers, including $10 submission
fee payable to Gender & Society,
To:
Christine E. Bose, Editor
Gender & Society
Department of Sociology
University at Albany
State University of New York
1400 Washington Avenue
Albany, New York 12222
Qualifications of
Guest Editors
Marlese Durr reviews manuscripts
for the American Sociological Review, Sociological Forum, Race
& Society, and Gender & Society. She serves
as a member of the Race & Society Editorial Board and of the
Gender & Society Editorial Board. She has been the Awards Chair for
SWS, has served on the SWS Membership Committee, and is currently a member
of its Publications Committee. Marlese has been a member of the Association
of Black Sociologists’ Executive and Program Committee and the Chair of
the Nominations Committee for the Section on Racial and Ethnic Minorities,
and she is presently a member of the Council for the section. In addition,
she serves as a member of the Nominations Committee for the Eastern Sociological
Society, and is Chair of the Eastern Sociological Society’s Rose Laub
Coser Dissertation Award Committee and Chair of the Race, Class, and Gender
section of the American Sociological Association. She has authored an
edited volume entitled, The New Politics of Race: From DuBois to the
21st Century (Praeger, forthcoming).
Shirley A. Hill teaches
classes and publishes research in the areas of the family, social inequality,
and health care. She reviews manuscripts for several journals, including
Gender & Society, the Journal of Marriage and the Family, and Sociological
Forum. She is on the Editorial Board of Contemporary Sociology
and Gender & Society, and was previously on the Editorial
Board of Sociological Inquiry. She is a member of ASA, ABS, MSS,
and SWS, and frequently presents research papers at meetings hosted by
these organizations. She has served on SWS’s Publications Committee, Social
Action Committee, and as chair of the Minority Scholar Committee. She
is currently Chair of the SWS Nominations Committee. Shirley is also active
in ASA, having served as a member and Chair of the Jessie Bernard Award
Committee and, currently, as a member of the Minority Fellowship Program
Committee. She has published articles in a variety of journals, including
Gender & Society.
Selected References
Allen, W. R. 1978. The
Search for Applicable Theories of Black Family Life. Journal of
Marriage and The Family, 40 (1), 117-129.
______.1979. Class, Culture
and Family Organization: The Effects of Class and Race on Family Structure
in Urban America. Journal of Comparative Family Studies,
10(3), 301-313.
Billingsley, A. 1968. Black
Families in White America. Englewood Cliffs, NJ:
Prentice-Hall.
______. 1992. Climbing
Jacob's Ladder: The enduring legacy of African-American families. NY:
Simon & Schuster.
Blee, K. M., and Tickamyer,
A. R. (1995). Racial differences in men’s attitudes about women’s gender
roles. Journal of Marriage and the Family 57(1):21-30.
Brewer, R. M. 1993. Theorizing
race, class and gender: The new scholarship of Black feminist intellectuals
and Black women's labor. In S.M. James and A. P. A. Busia (Eds.), Theorizing
Black Feminisms: The Visionary Pragmatism of Black Women (pp.
13-30). NY: Routledge.
Collins, P. H. 1990. Black
Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness, and The Politics of Empowerment.
Boston: Unwin Hyman.
Collins, S.M. Black
Corporate Executives: The Making and Breaking of a Black Middle Class.
Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Dill, B.T. 1988. "Our
Mother's Grief: Racial Ethnic Women and the Maintenance of Families."
Center for Research on Women, Memphis State University, 1986.
Durr, M. and J.R. Logan.
1997."Racial Submarkets in Government Employment: African American
Professionals in New York State". Sociological Forum,
Vol 12. No.3
Farley, R. 1984. Blacks
and Whites: Narrowing the Gap? Cambridge:Harvard University Press.
Freeman, R. 1976a. The
Black Elite. New York: McGraw Hill.
Freeman, R. 1976b. The
Over-Educated American. New York: Academic Press.
Freeman, R. 1981 "Black
Economic Progress after 1964: Who has Gained and Why." Pp. 247-295
in Studies in Labor Markets, edited by S. Rosen. Chicago:
University of Chicago Press.
Giddings, P. 1984. When
and Where I Enter: The Impact of Black Women on Race and Sex in America.
NY: Bantam Books.
Gutman, H. 1976. The
Black Family in Slavery and Freedom, 1750-1925. NY: Pantheon.
Hill, R. B. 1972. The
Strengths of Black Families. New York: Emerson Hall.
hooks, b. 1981. Ain't
I a woman: Black Women and Feminism. Boston: South End Press.
Hurst, C. E. 1998. Social
Inequality: Forms, Causes, and Consequences. Third Edition. Boston:
Allyn and Bacon.
Jarrett, R. L. (1996).
Welfare stigma among low-income, African American single mothers. Family
Relations 45:368-374.
Jaynes, G.D. and R.M Williams,
Jr. 1989. A common destiny: Black Americans and Society.
National Research Council. Washington, D.C.
Jones, J. 1985. Labor
of Love, Labor of Sorrow: Black Women, Work and the Family From Slavery
to The Present. New York: Vintage Books.
Kaplan, E. B. 1997. Not
our kind of girl. Berkeley: University of California Press.
King, D. K. 1988. Multiple
Jeopardy, Multiple consciousness: The Context of Black Feminist Ideology.
Signs, 14(11), 42-72.
Ladner, J. A. 1971. Tomorrow's
Tomorrow: The Black Woman. Garden City, NY: Doubleday
Ladner, J. A., and R.M.Gourdine.
1984. Intergenerational Teenage Motherhood: Some PreliminaryFindings.
Sage: A Scholarly Journal on Black Women, 1(2), 22-24.
Moynihan, D.P. 1965. The
Negro Family: A Case for National Action. Washington, D.C: Department
of Labor.
Menaghan, E. G. (1991).
Work experiences and family interaction processes: The long reach of the
job? Annual Review of Sociology 17:419-44.
Roschelle, A. R. 1997. No more kin:
Exploring race, class, and gender in family networks. Thousand
Oaks, CA: Sage.
Scanzoni, J. H. (1972).
Sexual bargaining: Power politics in the American marriage.
Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
J. D., Shelton, B. A.,
and Luschen, K. (1995). Race, ethnicity, gender, and perceptions of fairness.
Journal of Family Issues 16(3):357-79.
Sniderman, P.M and E.G.Carmine's
1997. Reaching Beyond Race. Cambridge: Harvard University
Press.
Smith, B. 1983. Home girls: A Black
Feminist Anthology. NY: Kitchen Table: Women of Color Press.
St. Jean, Y., and Feagin, J. R. (1998).
Double burden: Black women and everyday racism. Armonk,
NY: M. E. Sharpe.
Stack, C. 1974. All our kin: Strategies
for survival in a black community. NY: Harper & Row.
Staples, R. and L.B. Johnson. 1993. Black
families at the crossroads: Challenges and prospects. San Francisco:
Jossey-Bass Publishers.
White, D.G. 1999. Too Heavy a Load:
Black Women in Defense of themselves, 1984-1994. New York and
London: WW Norton & Company.
Wilson, William J. 1996. When Work
Disappears: The World of the New Urban Poor. New York: Alfred
A. Knopf.
Zinn, M. B. , and Eitzen,
S. (1999). Diversity in families. Fifth edition. NY: Longman.
|