Article 11

Annual Evaluation

11.2 Except as noted in Sections 11.2.3-5 and 31.6.2, the Department Chair shall conduct an annual evaluation of every Bargaining Unit Faculty Member in accordance with the Department’s faculty evaluation criteria taking into account the following criteria:

Teaching:

· Essential teaching-related behaviors include, but are not limited to the following:

1. preparation and distribution of syllabi
2. meeting class on a consistent basis, including on-time arrival and dismissal
3. professional classroom behavior
4. organization of course content and lectures
5. effective communication
6. effective delivery of appropriate content material
7. effective processes and materials for evaluating student learning
8. availability to students during scheduled office hours and appointments
9. teaching material that is current with the discipline

· Positive teaching-related activities include, but are not limited to the following:

1. creating innovative projects and assignments
2. teaching a larger than normal number of preparations or teaching section sizes that are larger than normal
3. conducting review sessions outside of normal class time
4. effective use of educational technology for students
5. serving as a teaching mentor for other faculty
6. being readily available to students beyond required office hours
7. developing a new course
8. developing a new teaching area
9. mentoring students
10. effectively supervising independent study projects
11. incorporating projects that involve service learning

Service:

For all Bargaining Unit Members positive service related activities include but are not limited to:

• Attending and participating in department meetings

For Instructors starting in their third year and Lecturers, Senior Lecturers, Clinical Instructors and Clinical Assistant Professors who have a reduced teaching load additional service is expected: The following are examples of positive service related activities, however this list is not intended to be exhaustive:

• Attending and participating in department and college meetings
• Serving and participating on department, college and university committees
• Chairing committees at a department, college or university level
• Participating in a professional capacity in community activities
• Serving in a professional organization at a local, state or national level
• Serving in the faculty Senate
• Advising student organizations
• Serving as a program director
• Mentoring other Bargaining Unit Members

11.2 Except as noted in Sections 11.2.3-5 and 31.6.2, the Department Chair shall conduct an annual evaluation of every Bargaining Unit Faculty Member in accordance with the Department’s faculty evaluation criteria specified in its bylaws pursuant to Section 10.4.4.2.

11.3 In preparation for the Chair’s evaluation, all Members of the Bargaining Unit will submit to the Chair a report of their teaching, scholarship, and service during the preceding year.

11.3.1 In addition to any materials required by this Agreement, by Department bylaws, or by the Department Chair, Bargaining Unit Faculty may include whatever material will provide evidence of successful teaching, scholarship or service.

11.3.2 The Department Chair may use other written materials if they document the Chair’s direct observation or are from identifiable sources. The Bargaining Unit Faculty Member shall be given a complete copy of such materials and provided the opportunity to respond to them in writing, and the Chair shall consider the Member’s response in writing her or his annual evaluation.

11.2.1 Except for those covered under Sections 11.2.3-6, for each area -- teaching, scholarship, and service -- the Chair will provide a written evaluation and assign an integer ranging from 0 to 4 with 0 = “unsatisfactory,” 1 = “adequate,” 2 = “meritorious,” 3 = “outstanding” and 4 = “extraordinary.” The University will then calculate an overall score rounded to the nearest 10^th, based on the relative weights assigned to teaching, scholarship, and service as specified in the department bylaws.

11.2.2 Course releases. Course releases granted by the university for research or service shall normally be reflected in the Chair’s assignment of weights in teaching, scholarship, and service. Course releases granted for work with the AAUP-WSU pursuant to Section 8.7 shall not affect the Chair’s assignment of weights in teaching, scholarship, and service.

11.2.3 For Members who became Bargaining Unit Faculty Members or returned to the Bargaining Unit on or after July 1 of the preceding year, the provisions of 11.2 and 11.2.1 will not apply unless –

the Member’s teaching was unsatisfactory according to the department’s faculty evaluation criteria, or

the Member requests in writing to have integers assigned in accordance with the provisions of Section 11.2.1

In all cases, the chair will provide a written evaluation of the Member’s teaching, scholarship, and service to the extent it is feasible to do so.

11.2.4 For Members with academic appointments who were on approved sick or military leave for one or more semesters or Members with fiscal appointments who were on such leave for two or more semesters, the provisions of 11.2 and 11.2.1 will not apply. Instead, the Member’s merit score will be the average of his or her merit scores for the previous three years.

11.2.5 The Provost will conduct the annual evaluation of Members who are budgeted 75% or more outside their home department and who report directly to a provost or a vice president for more than one academic semester of the year being evaluated. Each evaluation will be conducted in accordance with criteria that are contained in the Member’s job description and that are described in annual goals signed by the Bargaining Unit Faculty Member and the provost or vice president to whom she or he reports. Any modification of these annual goals must be agreed to by the Bargaining Unit Faculty Member. A signed copy of the goals for each year will be kept on file in the Office of the Provost, with copies distributed to the Member and to the AAUP-WSU.

11.2.5.1 The Members evaluated by the Provost pursuant to Section 11.2.5 shall be considered as a department for purposes of annual evaluation and distribution of merit raises pursuant to Section 11.6. The provost or vice president to whom each Member reports shall submit to the Provost a written evaluation of that Member based on the job description and signed goals. The Provost will assign merit scores (0.0-4.0) that are consistent with these evaluations.

11.2.6 When evaluating Members who are jointly appointed (11.1), Department Chairs of the Member’s primary department should solicit information from the Chair of the department in which a Member’s appointment is less than 50%. Information received shall be considered in the Chair’s evaluation pursuant to criteria set forth in the bylaws of the primary department. Information received is subject to Section 11.3.2.

11.3 In preparation for the Chair’s evaluation, all Members of the Bargaining Unit will submit to the Chair a report of their teaching, scholarship, and service during the preceding year.

11.3.1 In addition to any materials required by this Agreement, by Department bylaws, or by the Department Chair, Bargaining Unit Faculty may include whatever material will provide evidence of successful teaching, scholarship or service.

11.3.2 The Department Chair may use other written materials if they document the Chair’s direct observation or are from identifiable sources. The Bargaining Unit Faculty Member shall be given a complete copy of such materials and provided the opportunity to respond to them in writing, and the Chair shall consider the Member’s response in writing her or his annual evaluation.

11.3.3 For purposes of this Agreement, evaluations in a department will be done in a uniform manner and will be consistent with past practice. After conducting the evaluations, the Department Chair will send to each Member of the Bargaining Unit a copy of his or her evaluation.

11.4 The Member who disagrees with the Chair’s evaluation may send a written response to the Chair. This rebuttal shall be stapled to the original evaluation, forwarded to all other entities which receive a copy of the evaluation, and kept in the Department or College office as described in Section 13.3

11.4 The Member who disagrees with the Chair’s evaluation may send a written response to the Chair. This rebuttal shall be stapled to the original evaluation, forwarded to all other entities which receive a copy of the evaluation, and kept in the Department or College office as described in Section 13.3.
11.5 Annual Review for Untenured Bargaining Unit Faculty Members

11.5.1 Included in the Chair’s annual evaluation of all untenured Members of the Bargaining Unit shall be a statement reflecting peer evaluation of the individual’s teaching effectiveness. The Chair and the tenured Members of the Bargaining Unit in the Department share joint responsibility for ensuring that peer evaluation is conducted each year.

11.5.2 Included with the Chair’s annual evaluation of all untenured Members of the Bargaining Unit shall be a statement from the Chair summarizing the individual’s cumulative progress toward obtaining tenure. (13.7.1)

11.5.3 Independent of the Chair’s annual evaluation, the Department Promotion and Tenure Committee shall provide all untenured Members of the Bargaining Unit with an annual statement summarizing the individual Member’s cumulative progress toward obtaining tenure. (13.7.1)

11.6 The merit raise m_i for an individual Bargaining Unit Faculty Member will be determined as follows.

[formula from existing CBA stricken]

where:

M is the total merit pool for the Member’s department

[formula from existing CBA strike]

r is the percentage merit increase

n is the number of Bargaining Unit Faculty in the Member’s department

p_i is the Member’s “overall score rounded to the nearest 10^th” as specified in Section 11.2.1

b_i is the Member’s base salary

p_j and b_j are the overall score and base salary, respectively, for all the Bargaining Unit Faculty in the Member’s department. (Here, j is equal to 1,2,3, and so forth, up to n.)

11.6.1 In departments where some faculty are on academic year appointments and some faculty are on fiscal year appointments, merit raises m_i will be calculated as follows:

The base salary of each fiscal year faculty will be converted to an academic equivalent by multiplying each fiscal base salary b_i by 9/11ths to obtain an adjusted base salary b_i*.

These adjusted base salaries b_i* will be used in place of the corresponding fiscal base salaries b_i to compute an adjusted total merit pool M*.

The adjusted base salaries and the adjusted total merit pool M* will be used to compute the merit raise m_i of each faculty member on an academic year appointment and the adjusted merit raise m_i* of each faculty member on a fiscal year appointment.

For each faculty member on a fiscal year appointment, this adjusted merit raise m_i* will be multiplied by 11/9ths to determine the Member’s actual merit raise m_i.

In the event that the merit pool M calculated in accordance with Section 11.6 using the actual base salaries of all Bargaining Unit Faculty (fiscal and academic) is insufficient to cover the total of merit raises when calculated using the procedure outlined in 11.6.1, then the University will adjust the pool to provide sufficient funds.

11.6.2 The merit raise for a Bargaining Unit Faculty Member who has no calculated overall score pursuant to Section 11.2.3 shall be computed by assigning the Member the average of the overall scores in her or his department pursuant to Section 11.2.1.

11.6.3 A Member who begins employment January 1 or later shall not be eligible for a salary increase during that calendar year. A statement in or attached to the offer letters for such Members will confirm that the base salary continues through the end of the first academic year (or, if applicable, fiscal year) of employment.

11.7 Annual Evaluation Grievances.

11.7.1 Grievances alleging that a Department Chair’s annual evaluation of a Bargaining Unit Faculty Member did not reasonably comply with a specific provision(s) of this Agreement or with a specific provision(s) of the Department or College Bylaws may be filed relating to a single year’s evaluation.

11.7.1.1 Grievances pursuant to 11.7.1 must be filed not later than forty (40) days after a Bargaining Unit Faculty Member receives her or his annual evaluation or by June 1, whichever is later. Otherwise, procedures for such grievances are as specified in Article 16.

11.7.2 Grievances alleging that a Department Chair’s annual evaluations of a Bargaining Unit Faculty Member have been inconsistent with evaluations of other Members or in any other way involved a pattern of faulty judgment or prejudicial treatment, must refer to a period of at least three years, beginning no more than five years prior to the filing of the grievance.

11.7.2.1 Upon receiving a grievance pursuant to Section 11.7.2 the AAUP-WSU and the University shall form a four-member Evaluation Appeals Committee consisting of two members selected by the AAUP-WSU and two members selected by the University. None of the Committee members may be from the appellant’s department.

11.7.2.2 The appellant’s current department chair will be given an opportunity to submit a written response to the grievance, and the appellant will be given an opportunity to comment on or rebut the department chair’s statement.

11.7.2.3 The Evaluation Appeals Committee shall review materials submitted by the appellant and any response submitted by the appellant’s department chair. In addition, the Committee may request that the appellant or other persons with knowledge of the case appear before the Committee or respond to the Committee’s questions in writing.

11.7.2.4 Following the review of materials and testimony relevant to the case, the Evaluation Appeals Committee will send to the Provost and to the AAUP-WSU a report stating whether or not a significant pattern of inconsistent evaluations is substantiated, the basis for its findings, and its determination of revised evaluations for the affected years.

11.7.2.5 If the Evaluation Appeals Committee revises any annual evaluations for the grievant, the University and the AAUP-WSU will jointly calculate the grievant’s current base salary as it would have been if the revised evaluations had been awarded in the affected years.

11.7.2.6 Because the decisions of the Evaluations Appeals Committee are final, grievances submitted to that committee are not subject to arbitration by an external arbitrator.