Article 11
Annual Evaluation
11.1 The purpose of the
University evaluation procedure described herein is twofold: to help Bargaining
Unit Faculty improve their professional development; and to inform decisions
regarding merit pay, reappointment, dismissal, tenure, and
promotion. In this Article, whenever a reference to “department” is made, it
shall be understood that this refers to the college in the College of Nursing
and Health and the Lake Campus. For jointly appointed Bargaining Unit Faculty,
“department” refers to the Member’s “primary” department, which is the academic
unit in which a Member is appointed more than 50% (see Section 11.2.6).
11.2 Except as noted in
Sections 11.2.3-5 and 31.6.2, the Department Chair shall conduct an annual
evaluation of every Bargaining Unit Faculty Member in accordance with the
Department’s faculty evaluation criteria specified in its bylaws pursuant
to Section 10.4.4.2.
11.2.1 Except for those
covered under Sections 11.2.3-6, for each area -- teaching, scholarship, and
service -- the Chair will provide a written evaluation and assign an integer
ranging from 0 to 4 with 0 = “unsatisfactory,” 1 = “adequate,” 2 = “meritorious,”
3 = “outstanding” and 4 = “extraordinary.” The University will then calculate
an overall score rounded to the nearest 10th, based on the relative
weights assigned to teaching, scholarship, and service as specified in the
department bylaws.
11.2.2 Course releases. Course
releases granted by the university for research or service shall normally be
reflected in the Chair’s assignment of weights in teaching, scholarship, and
service. Course releases granted for work with the AAUP-WSU pursuant to Section
8.7 shall not affect the Chair’s assignment of weights in teaching,
scholarship, and service.
11.2.3 For Members who became
Bargaining Unit Faculty Members or returned to the Bargaining Unit on or after
July 1 of the preceding year, the provisions of 11.2 and 11.2.1 will not apply
unless –
the Member’s
teaching was unsatisfactory according to the department’s faculty evaluation
criteria, or
the Member
requests in writing to have integers assigned in accordance with the provisions
of Section 11.2.1
In all cases, the chair will
provide a written evaluation of the Member’s teaching, scholarship, and service
to the extent it is feasible to do so.
11.2.4 For Members with
academic appointments who were on approved sick or military leave for one or
more semesters or Members with fiscal appointments who were on such leave for two
or more semesters, the provisions of 11.2 and 11.2.1 will not apply. Instead,
the Member’s merit score will be the average of his or her merit scores for the
previous three years.
11.2.5 The Provost will conduct the annual
evaluation of Members who are budgeted 75% or more outside their home
department and who report directly to a provost or a vice president for more
than one academic semester of the year being evaluated. Each evaluation will be
conducted in accordance with criteria that are contained in the Member’s job
description and that are described in annual goals signed by the Bargaining
Unit Faculty Member and the provost or vice president to whom she or he
reports. Any modification of these annual goals must be agreed to by the
Bargaining Unit Faculty Member. A signed copy of the goals for each year will
be kept on file in the Office of the Provost, with copies distributed to the
Member and to the AAUP-WSU.
11.2.5.1 The Members evaluated by the Provost
pursuant to Section 11.2.5 shall be considered as a department for purposes of
annual evaluation and distribution of merit raises pursuant to Section 11.6.
The provost or vice president to whom each Member reports shall submit to the Provost
a written evaluation of that Member based on the job description and signed
goals. The Provost will assign merit scores (0.0-4.0) that are consistent with
these evaluations.
11.2.6 When evaluating Members who are jointly
appointed (11.1), Department Chairs of the Member’s primary department should
solicit information from the Chair of the department in which a Member’s
appointment is less than 50%. Information received shall be considered in the
Chair’s evaluation pursuant to criteria set forth in the bylaws of the primary
department. Information received is subject to Section 11.3.2.
11.3 In preparation for the
Chair’s evaluation, all Members of the Bargaining Unit will submit to the Chair
a report of their teaching, scholarship, and service during the
preceding year.
11.3.1 In addition to any
materials required by this Agreement, by Department bylaws, or by the
Department Chair, Bargaining Unit Faculty may include whatever material will
provide evidence of successful teaching, scholarship or service.
11.3.2 The Department Chair may
use other written materials if they document the Chair’s direct observation or
are from identifiable sources. The Bargaining Unit Faculty Member shall be
given a complete copy of such materials and provided the opportunity to respond
to them in writing, and the Chair shall consider the Member’s response in
writing her or his annual evaluation.
11.3.3 After conducting the
evaluations, the Department Chair will send to each Member of the Bargaining
Unit a copy of his or her evaluation.
11.4 The Member who disagrees
with the Chair’s evaluation may send a written response to the Chair. This
rebuttal shall be stapled to the original evaluation, forwarded to all other
entities which receive a copy of the evaluation, and kept in the Department or
College office as described in Section 13.3.
11.5
Annual Review for Untenured Bargaining Unit Faculty Members
11.5.1 Included in the Chair’s
annual evaluation of all untenured Members of the Bargaining Unit shall be a
statement reflecting peer evaluation of the individual’s teaching
effectiveness. The Chair and the tenured Members of the Bargaining Unit in the
Department share joint responsibility for ensuring that peer evaluation is
conducted each year.
11.5.2 Included with the Chair’s
annual evaluation of all untenured Members of the Bargaining Unit shall be a
statement from the Chair summarizing the individual’s cumulative progress
toward obtaining tenure. (13.7.1)
11.5.3 Independent of the
Chair’s annual evaluation, the Department Promotion and Tenure Committee shall
provide all untenured Members of the Bargaining Unit with an annual statement
summarizing the individual Member’s cumulative progress toward obtaining
tenure. (13.7.1)
11.6 The merit raise mi for an individual Bargaining Unit Faculty Member will be determined as follows.
[formula from existing CBA stricken]
where:
M is the total merit pool for
the Member’s department
[formula from existing CBA strike]
r is the percentage merit
increase
n is the number of Bargaining
Unit Faculty in the Member’s department
pi is the
Member’s “overall
score rounded to the nearest 10th” as
specified in Section 11.2.1
bi is the
Member’s base salary
pj and bj are the
overall score and base salary, respectively, for all the Bargaining Unit
Faculty in the Member’s
department. (Here, j is equal to
1,2,3, and so forth, up to n.)
11.6.1 In
departments where some faculty are on academic year appointments and some
faculty are on fiscal year appointments, merit raises mi will be
calculated as follows:
The base salary of each fiscal year faculty will be
converted to an academic equivalent by multiplying each fiscal base salary bi by 9/11ths
to obtain an adjusted base salary bi*.
These adjusted base salaries bi* will be used
in place of the corresponding fiscal base salaries bi to compute
an adjusted total merit pool M*.
The adjusted base salaries and the adjusted total
merit pool M* will be
used to compute the merit raise mi of each
faculty member on an academic year appointment and the adjusted merit raise mi* of each
faculty member on a fiscal year appointment.
For each faculty member on a fiscal year
appointment, this adjusted merit raise mi* will be
multiplied by 11/9ths to determine the Member’s actual
merit raise mi.
In the event
that the merit pool M calculated
in accordance with Section 11.6 using the
actual base salaries of all Bargaining Unit Faculty (fiscal and academic) is
insufficient to cover the total of merit raises when calculated using the
procedure outlined in 11.6.1, then the
University will adjust the pool to provide sufficient funds.
11.6.2 The merit
raise for a Bargaining Unit Faculty Member who has no calculated overall score
pursuant to Section 11.2.3 shall be computed by assigning the Member the
average of the overall scores in her or his department pursuant to Section
11.2.1.
11.6.3 A Member
who begins employment January 1 or later shall not be eligible for a salary
increase during that calendar year. A statement in or attached to the offer
letters for such Members will confirm that the base salary continues through the end of
the first academic year (or, if applicable, fiscal year) of employment.
11.7 Annual
Evaluation Grievances.
11.7.1 Grievances alleging that a Department Chair’s
annual evaluation of a Bargaining Unit Faculty Member did not reasonably comply
with a specific provision(s) of this Agreement or with a specific provision(s)
of the Department or College Bylaws may be filed relating to a single year’s
evaluation.
11.7.1.1 Grievances pursuant to 11.7.1 must be
filed not later than forty (40) days after a Bargaining Unit Faculty Member
receives her or his annual evaluation or by June 1, whichever is later.
Otherwise, procedures for such grievances are as specified in Article 16.
11.7.2 Grievances alleging that a Department Chair’s
annual evaluations of a Bargaining Unit Faculty Member have been inconsistent
with evaluations of other Members or in any other way involved a pattern of
faulty judgment or prejudicial treatment, must refer to a period of at least
three years, beginning no more than five years prior to the filing of the
grievance.
11.7.2.1 Upon receiving a grievance pursuant to
Section 11.7.2 the AAUP-WSU and the University shall form a four-member
Evaluation Appeals Committee consisting of two members selected by the AAUP-WSU
and two members selected by the University. None of the Committee members may
be from the appellant’s department.
11.7.2.2 The appellant’s current department chair
will be given an opportunity to submit a written response to the grievance, and
the appellant will be given an opportunity to comment on or rebut the
department chair’s statement.
11.7.2.3 The Evaluation Appeals Committee shall
review materials submitted by the appellant and any response submitted by the
appellant’s department chair. In addition, the Committee may request that the
appellant or other persons with knowledge of the case appear before the
Committee or respond to the Committee’s questions in writing.
11.7.2.4 Following the review of materials and
testimony relevant to the case, the Evaluation Appeals Committee will send to
the Provost and to the AAUP-WSU a report stating whether or not a significant
pattern of inconsistent evaluations is substantiated, the basis for its
findings, and its determination of revised evaluations for the affected years.
11.7.2.5 If the Evaluation Appeals Committee
revises any annual evaluations for the grievant, the University and the
AAUP-WSU will jointly calculate the grievant’s current base salary as it would
have been if the revised evaluations had been awarded in the affected years.
11.7.2.6 Because the decisions of the Evaluations
Appeals Committee are final, grievances submitted to that committee are not
subject to arbitration by an external arbitrator.
|