WRIGHT
STATE UNIVERSITY
FACULTY SENATE MINUTES
Monday
April 5, 2004
Minutes reviewed by University Faculty
President Jack Dustin and University Registrar, Dave Sauter. Prepared by the Office of the
Registrar.
I.
Call
to Order:
Senators: (those present in bold); Chamberlain, Ava; Baker, Marjorie;
Duke, Janice; Fichtenbaum, Rudy; Fossum, Eric; Foy, Brent; Goldstein, David;
Houston, Maggie; Lauf, Peter;
Lemkau, Jeanne; Leung, Jackson; Lindsey, Jill; McNutt, Mindy; Menart, James; Meyer, Cheryl; Nagey,
Allen (substitute); OÕBrien, Mari; Reynolds, David; Rizki, Mateen; Sayer,
Cathy; Seitz, David; Self, Eileen; Traynor, Tom; Vermeersch, Patricia; Voss,
Dan; Walbroehl, Gordon;
Wolner, Kathleen.
Faculty President - Dustin, Jack; Faculty President Elect - Pringle,
Drew; President
(Ex-officio/non-voting) Goldenberg, Kim; Provost (Ex-officio/non-voting) - Hopkins, David; Parliamentarian - Sav, Tom; Secretary - Sauter, Dave.
II.
Approval
of the Minutes:
The
minutes of the March 1, 2004, meeting were approved as written.
Located
at: http://www.wright.edu/admin/senate/minutes/Mar04SenMin.html
III.
Report
of the President Ð Dr. Goldenberg
á No report, comments as above
A.
UGEC Report: Henry Limouze (Attachment A).
Dr.
Limouze commented that MTH 145 has not been approved for the Ohio Transfer
Module by OBR. Other institutions in the State of Ohio do not have their
standard GE course as part of the Transfer Module, and it does not seem like
MTH 145 in its present form or substitutions will be approved by OBR.
B.
Guest Report: Classroom of the Future Committee
David
Grossie and Lillie Howard spoke to the April 5 document prepared for University
Classrooms of the Future. Much data has been compiled and the bottom line seems
to be that we have enough classrooms.
However, we do not have the right configuration of classrooms. Classroom
issues identified include (1) Òbumping upÓ to larger classrooms due to
technology needs; (2) 15% of the classrooms are operating at less than 40%
utilization; (3) the prioritization used for assigning classroom space; and (4)
our new timeblocks are based on 4-credit hour classesÉwe ÒwasteÓ classroom time
because a 3-credit hour class is vacant for 25 minutes until the next timeblock
starts.
Question
regarding off-campus classes: if these classes were brought to campus would
space become a problem? Answer
(V-P Howard): Off-campus and distance-learning type courses, etc. are not
counted in the space allocation.
OBR guidelines do not allow for those to be included. If all the classrooms were electronic,
we would not have any problems scheduling classrooms. VP Howard commented that
there are vacant classrooms due to Òbumping-upÓ for access to technology. Sixty of the current 120 classrooms
have electronic technology.
V-P
Filipic offered that the 70% classroom and 50% for laboratory maximum utilization
number established by OBR is a guideline.
Some states require higher utilization. California and others require 80 to 90% utilization. Given less state dollars for capital
projects means WSU must sell bonds to pay for new classroom space. Limited resources require us to analyze
what will be needed and how best to achieve those goals.
Regarding
a question about renovations to create medical classroom space in the White
Health Center, the Provost comment:
We need to bring back to campus classes due to the closing of the
Franciscan Medical Center and less classroom space at the VA Hospital. Student Union renovation and science
lab renovation are all also related to meet this challenge.
Additional comments from J. Dustin: Quadrennial Committee is underway to
review the
constitution. Please forward comments to
Virginia Nehring.
NCAA Steering Committee; subcommittees
may need representation.
A. Faculty Budget Priority Committee:
Jack Dustin. Letter is being prepared to be sent to various units on campus
regarding policies and implementation.
B. Non-Bargaining Unit Faculty Affairs
Committee: Carole Endres. Three items as old business presented today.
C. Undergraduate Curriculum & Academic
Policy Committee: Tom Sav.
UCAPC report is attached.
D. Buildings & Grounds Committee:
Shelley Jagow. Report attached.
Senator
Fichtenbaum chaired a B&G Committee meeting to review the Pavilion project.
Vicky Davidson and Jim Runkle shared their insights on the project, including
Dr. RunkleÕs memo concerning the negative impact of the Pavilion on the
Biological Preserve. Operating costs were also discussed, approximately $90,000
annually, as well as long-term upkeep costs being paid for by the WSU budget. B&G
Committee passed a resolution that (1) Pavilion should be sited where it will
not have an adverse impact on the Biological Preserve since it is an important
and heavily used WSU resource, and (2) before WSU acceptance of a building
utilizing donor funds, donors should provide an endowment for annual operating
expenses as well as long-term maintenance dollars.
Provost
Hopkins commented that Dr. RunkleÕs comments are still being considered, so
that while the current design impacts the edge of the Preserve, conversations
will continue. Regarding donors, this type of project with donor dollars might
be the wave of the future as a big part of capital improvements. The Pavilion
has the impact to relieve Nutter Center and Student Union recreational
facilities. The impact of donor endowments needs to be thought through and
factored into this. Senator Chamberlain asked if environmental impact studies
could occur, and Assistant VP Davidson commented that only this site has had
such a study. The study covered the grassy area, creek, and tree line, and Dr.
RunkleÕs concerns were with the impinging into the tree line.
President
Dustin reminded the faculty that at the March 1, 2004 Faculty Senate meeting
the senate voted to create a process to place new initiatives Òon the tableÓ
for discussion. With all the proposals, how are opportunities and costs weighed
for long-term decision-making? Lacking in this is the ÒprocessÓ whereby future
donorsÕ and the university have guidelines established.
E. Information Technology Committee:
Vince Yen. No report.
F. Student Affairs Committee: Margaret
Clark Graham. No report.
G. Student Petitions Committee: KT
Mechlin: See Attachment.
VIII. Old Business:
Proposed and
voted items A through E moved for approval. Moved, seconded, and approved.
A. COLA Program Change: B.A.
Anthropology - Tom Sav http://www.wright.edu/~tom.sav/ucapc/0004/fsreport/athrop.pdf
B. COLA New Program: Certificate of Completion
- LEAP Intensive English Program
(Substitute to TOEFL) - Tom Sav
http://www.wright.edu/~tom.sav/ucapc/0004/fsreport/toefl.pdf
http://www.wright.edu/admin/senate/agendas/HumanicsGradCert.html
http://www.wright.edu/admin/senate/agendas/Discipline.html
Amendment provided on website. Approved
http://www.wright.edu/admin/senate/agendas/Academic
Freedom.html
Senator Sayer commented that Òthose not having administrative
appointmentsÓ mentioned, left out of second line. Bill Rickert, Associate
Provost, commented that academic freedom applies to all faculty, even if they
hold administrative appointments. Thus, the statement is not required. Approved
http://www.wright.edu/admin/senate/agendas/AnnualFacultyEvaluations2.html
Motion approved.
ÒThe drop date
for all students shall be at the end of the seventh week of each ten-week term
and at the end of the second day of the fourth week for every five-week term.
8.
New Business
ALL APPROVED
TO MOVE TO OLD BUSINESS.
A. COSM Program
Change: B.A. and B.S. Psychology - Tom Sav
http://www.wright.edu/~tom.sav/ucapc/0004/fsreport/psy.pdf
B. CONH Program
Change: B.S. Nursing, BEACON Program - Tom Sav
http://www.wright.edu/~tom.sav/ucapc/0004/fsreport/beacon.pdf
C. CECS Program
Change: B.S. Mechanical Engineering - Tom Sav
http://www.wright.edu/~tom.sav/ucapc/0004/fsreport/me.pdf
D. CECS Program
Change: B.S. Material Science & Engineering - Tom Sav
http://www.wright.edu/~tom.sav/ucapc/0004/fsreport/mse.pdf
E. GE Program
Change: Area VI College Component-CECS Addition of ISE 210-Henry Limouze
Available in the Faculty Office, 138 Fawcett Hall
F. GE Program
Change: Area V Natural Sciences-Sequence Substitutions/Courses-Henry Limouze
http://www.wright.edu/~tom.sav/ucapc/0004/fsreport/geseqsub.pdf
IX.
Announcements:
The
following is applicable via Provost Memorandum No. 82-3, May 1, 1982.
ÒThe
President of the Faculty shall have a two course, or two-third, reduction in
his or her full-time teaching load during the Fall, Winter, and Spring Quarters
of his or her term of office. The President Elect of the Faculty shall
have a one course, or one-third, reduction in his or her full-time teaching
load for the Spring Quarter of his or her term of office.Ó
B. Any curriculum or academic policy proposals that require
approval this academic year must be submitted to the UCAPC by March
31. Pending approval by the UCAPC, the Faculty Senate will consider
it as New Business at its May 3 meeting and act on it as Old Business at its
June 7 meeting.
C.
Next Senate Meeting: May 3, 2004, 2:30 p.m., E156 Student Union.
X.
Adjournment:
The meeting adjourned at 4:45 p.m.