Back to Newsletter Home Page

WAC Newsletter
Number 5
Wright State University
September 1997


INSIDE:

New WAC Policy for Returning Students
Notes from Other WAC Programs


Change in WAC Policy for Transfer
and Returning Students

September 1997



All faculty and staff members involved in advising need to be aware of changes in WAC policy for transfer and returning students. These changes involve the four designated writing intensive (WI) classes that constitute the GE portion of the WAC program. The basic requirement remains the same. As before, transfer students who have completed the transfer module that is part of the Ohio Articulation and Transfer Policy are considered to have completed the GE portion of the WAC requirement. Transfer students who have not completed the transfer module are required to take a number of WI courses according to the amount of the transfer module they have completed. Those who have completed at least 75% (40 hours) need to take one WI course in GE. Those with 50-74% (28-39 hours) need two WI courses; those with 25-49% (14-27 hours) need to complete three WI courses; those with under 25% (14 hours) need to complete all four designated WI courses in GE.

Returning students who first enrolled at WSU prior to the fall of 1996 and have been away from the university for a year or more, who are under the new GE program, and who have not completed those GE requirements must use the same formula to satisfy the WAC requirements in GE.

During the first year of the program, an unexpected difficulty became evident: some students have already completed the equivalents of the General Education courses identified as Writing Intensive at WSU; however, because of the number of hours they are transferring, they still need one or more WAC credits in GE according to the current guidelines. For example, a student who transfers 30 hours--including credit for Sociology 200, Economics 200, and English 204--would still need two writing intensive GE courses because of the number of hours transferred. That student needs to take a designated WI science course but still needs one more WI credit. If the policy were enforced strictly as written

, the student would have to repeat one of the specified WI classes or go through an elaborate appeals process. Returning students who had completed earlier versions of GE classes subsequently identified as WI could find themselves facing a similar situation.

At its May meeting, Academic Council voted to amend the original WAC document to permit these transfer students and returning students to count other designated WI courses toward the missing GE credit. Such courses could be either GE courses (e.g., a second WI science course) or WI classes in the major in addition to the two required as part of the program. Any WI course in the major, however, will not count toward both GE and writing in the major requirements.

The section of the WAC document dealing with transfer students now includes the following passage (following line 202 of the original document):

When students who still need writing intensive credit in General Education courses already have credit for the General Education courses designated as writing intensive at WSU, those students may apply credit from other designated writing intensive courses to meet that requirement. Those courses may be in General Education (e.g., a second writing intensive science course) or, when available, a third writing intensive course in the major. No writing intensive course in the major will be counted toward both General Education and writing in the major requirements.



A similar statement has been added in the section dealing with returning students (following line 237 in the original document):

When returning students who still need writing intensive credit in General Education courses have already taken earlier versions of General Education courses now designated as writing intensive, those students may apply credit from other designated writing intensive courses to meet that requirement. Those courses may be in General Education (e.g., a second writing intensive science course) or, when available, a third writing intensive course in the major. No writing intensive course in the major will be counted toward both General Education and writing in the major requirements.



These additional options are intended to accommodate the needs of returning students, not to place additional burdens on them or on departments. Students who cannot take advantage of the changes can still satisfy the requirements of the GE portion of the WAC program as outlined in the original document. Print copies of that document are available in the WAC office (052 Paul Laurence Dunbar Library). The full text is also available on this WAC web page by accessing WAC Requirements at WSU, where these modifications are printed in red.

If you have questions about these changes, please contact Joe Law at 775-2155 or by e-mail at joe.law@wright.edu.

Top

 


 

Notes from Other WAC Programs
September 1997


Here's a frequently asked question: How much should the writing component count toward the total grade of a writing intensive course?

The WAC guidelines at WSU state that all of the writing assignments in writing intensive courses in the major "will count as part of the students' performance in the course." However, the guidelines don't state how much they will count, thus leaving that decision to the individual instructor. It may be of some help, then, to see what other WAC programs say on the subject.

Not surprisingly, practices vary. When programs do specify an amount, it often takes the form of a recommendation rather than a requirement. The most frequent figure is a minimum of 50%. The web site for Eastern Tennessee State University, for example, provides this information: "A substantial portion of the final grade is based on student writing--that is, on written assignments and/or essay exams. (Generally, the writing committee recommends that 50% or more of the final grade be based on written materials, unless there are mitigating factors such as accreditation requirements or semester projects.)"

The University of Minnesota, on the other hand, is more directive: "At least 50% of the course grade should be based upon the student's writing. The essay examination should be the dominant mode for examinations, not multiple-choice or short-answer tests. Other forms of writing should also figure strongly in the course assessment. No student who fails to demonstrate at least adequate writing ability should be passed in a WI course."

Things seem more relaxed at the University of Hawaii at Manoa: "We depend here on the good judgment of individual professors. We all know that the student's most common question is, 'Will this be on the test?' Clearly, students see what contributes to their grade as important and anything else as less important. We signify the importance of writing by making it contribute to the course grade in real ways."

The "real ways" writing contributes to the course grade are determined by individual professors at University of California-Irvine as well. The model syllabi provided on the WAC web page there suggest that at times writing assignments constitute more than half the course grade. That's the case in History 193W (Victorian Women: Gender, Sex and Race in 19th-century U.S. & Europe). A weekly log counts 25%, Paper 1 is 25%, Paper 2 is 30%, and the remaining 20% is assigned on the basis of participation. Other course descriptions indicate that a similarly high percentage of the course grade comes from written work.

Even though there is no universal agreement on factoring written work into the final grade in a writing intensive course, the frequent designation of 50% as a minimum seems appropriate. Writing assignments that reinforce course content and help students realize the teacher's instructional goals are valuable parts of the class and deserve to be acknowledged as such.

T op



This page last modified 10/07/97.
Send comments to Dr. Joe Law